I know its been a while since my last post. Things have been crazy during the holidays and getting ready for the arrival of our son. I found a little gem in Genesis 28 that may or may not be of interest. After Jacob's deception of Esau and Isaac, both Isaac and Rebekah agreed that Jacob must return to the family homeland to find a suitable wife. So Isaac blesses Jacob. This blessing is probably more like a final will. Then Isaac reaffirms the divine promise that Jacob should go to Paddan-Aram to find a wife and may his endeavor be fruitful for the nations.
In 28:6, we learn that Esau has witnessed this event and his reaction is quite interesting. He now understands that his marriage to Canaanite women does not please Isaac. His attempt at remedying the situation may just be fate or it may carry some symbolism. He decides that he will go on his own journey, just like Jacob, to marry again, this time within the family kinship. His choice is astounding. He goes to Ishmael and selects his daughter Mahalath. Esau was the first son, but was not the son of promise. How ironic is it that he goes to Ishmael, Abraham's first son, but not his son of promise. This is further evidence that God had special plans for Jacob even though all of the questions surrounding his selection may be hard for us to grasp.
As promised, this was nothing special, just an interesting little gem from the text.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Monday, December 15, 2008
What is the fear of the Lord?
The first seven verses of the book of Proverbs give us a lot of insight. The goal of the Proverbs is to produce wisdom, discipline, and understanding to those who are naive. The naive are those who are on the brink of adulthood. The Proverbs are designed to be a boot camp for wisdom. The word for 'Proverb' (mashal) is basically the same word as parable. The Proverbs require deep reflection as did the parables of Jesus. On a side note, there could be a connection to Jesus from these verses. Jesus and Solomon both descended from David and both enjoyed same style of instruction. But Jesus told his listeners that he was greater than Solomon (Matt. 12:42).
The purpose statement for proverbs is given in 1:7. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge. What does it mean to fear the Lord? Do we fear offending him and ultimately being punished? Do we simply respect and revere him? Might I suggest we look to David for the answer to this question.
Psa. 51 is David's response to his sin with Bathsheba. In verse 11 and 12, David begged that the Lord not leave him. This plea is really powerful when we consider that David witnessed God abandon Saul. This context offers a powerful definition for fearing the Lord. Fearing the Lord is not fear the Lord's coming but fear of his leaving!!! This is where the road to godly wisdom begins!
The purpose statement for proverbs is given in 1:7. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge. What does it mean to fear the Lord? Do we fear offending him and ultimately being punished? Do we simply respect and revere him? Might I suggest we look to David for the answer to this question.
Psa. 51 is David's response to his sin with Bathsheba. In verse 11 and 12, David begged that the Lord not leave him. This plea is really powerful when we consider that David witnessed God abandon Saul. This context offers a powerful definition for fearing the Lord. Fearing the Lord is not fear the Lord's coming but fear of his leaving!!! This is where the road to godly wisdom begins!
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
laziness
I am sure we have all felt a streak of laziness from one time to another. Proverbs six has an interesting and stern take on laziness.
If the lazy man will observe the work habit, self-discipline, and foresight of the ant, he will be productive. Proverbs 6 might be enlightened when we recall one of the boundaries that God set in creation in Genesis 1. If you remember the creation account, God told man that he was to rule over the animals (1:28). Yet, Adam and Eve made the mistake of letting an animal tell them what to do. Rather than ruling the animals, the lazy man must look to the animals for instruction. This is a reversal of created order. Could it be that laziness is a violation of created order? If so, it is bound to produce chaos. Proverbs 6 reveals that the lazy man will encounter chaos in the form of poverty. Usually the Lord has a special place in his heart for the needy, but not in this case.
It is becoming more and more common for Christians to seek evangelism by helping the poor. However, our American poverty is not like the poverty of ancient times. In our American culture, there is ample opportunity for a person to receive assistance, education, and to make something of themselves. We live on the assumption that the poor can't help being poor. But Proverbs tells us something different. I believe the lazy man of Proverbs is more of an indication of the type of poverty we have in America. Some people are poor by choice! If that is their attitude about life, how likely are they to reform their minds and obey the teachings of Christ? Perhaps we need to reconsider our premise when evangelizing through need based programs. The need may not be food, clothing, or shelter; there may be a need of effort!
If the lazy man will observe the work habit, self-discipline, and foresight of the ant, he will be productive. Proverbs 6 might be enlightened when we recall one of the boundaries that God set in creation in Genesis 1. If you remember the creation account, God told man that he was to rule over the animals (1:28). Yet, Adam and Eve made the mistake of letting an animal tell them what to do. Rather than ruling the animals, the lazy man must look to the animals for instruction. This is a reversal of created order. Could it be that laziness is a violation of created order? If so, it is bound to produce chaos. Proverbs 6 reveals that the lazy man will encounter chaos in the form of poverty. Usually the Lord has a special place in his heart for the needy, but not in this case.
It is becoming more and more common for Christians to seek evangelism by helping the poor. However, our American poverty is not like the poverty of ancient times. In our American culture, there is ample opportunity for a person to receive assistance, education, and to make something of themselves. We live on the assumption that the poor can't help being poor. But Proverbs tells us something different. I believe the lazy man of Proverbs is more of an indication of the type of poverty we have in America. Some people are poor by choice! If that is their attitude about life, how likely are they to reform their minds and obey the teachings of Christ? Perhaps we need to reconsider our premise when evangelizing through need based programs. The need may not be food, clothing, or shelter; there may be a need of effort!
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Standing Up For the Little Man
Exodus 2 gives us a valuable character study into the life of the adult Moses. From three instances we learn that Moses has a special place in his heart for the oppressed. First, Moses stands up to an Egyptian oppressor. As Moses surveyed the scene, he did not notice Egyptian luxury, noble society, or a great empire; he saw forced labor. Even though Moses is of the high court, he still considers his Hebrew kinsmen. When he witnessed an Egyptian in the process of beating a Hebrew to death, he intervened and killed the Egyptian oppressor in the same way he was afflicting the Hebrew.
Second, Moses stands up to a Hebrew bully. The next day, he observes two Hebrews fighting so he addresses the guilty one and stops the fight. The guilty one is not happy and scolds Moses for assuming an authoritative role that he does not have. He also reveals that he knows that Moses has killed an Egyptian (perhaps he uses this knowledge as blackmail). When Pharaoh learns that Moses has killed an Egyptian he demands Moses' life, forcing Moses flees to Midian.
Finally, Moses stands up to belligerent shepherds. In Midian, Moses takes rest at a well. He witnesses local shepherds pushing aside the priest of Midians’ daughters. Again, Moses intervened and came to their rescue and watered their flocks.
From these three instances we learn that Moses is passionate for standing up for the oppressed. As chapter two comes to a close, we also learn that Israel is being oppressed and is in need of someone to stand up for them. Who might there be to stand up to the Egyptians?
Second, Moses stands up to a Hebrew bully. The next day, he observes two Hebrews fighting so he addresses the guilty one and stops the fight. The guilty one is not happy and scolds Moses for assuming an authoritative role that he does not have. He also reveals that he knows that Moses has killed an Egyptian (perhaps he uses this knowledge as blackmail). When Pharaoh learns that Moses has killed an Egyptian he demands Moses' life, forcing Moses flees to Midian.
Finally, Moses stands up to belligerent shepherds. In Midian, Moses takes rest at a well. He witnesses local shepherds pushing aside the priest of Midians’ daughters. Again, Moses intervened and came to their rescue and watered their flocks.
From these three instances we learn that Moses is passionate for standing up for the oppressed. As chapter two comes to a close, we also learn that Israel is being oppressed and is in need of someone to stand up for them. Who might there be to stand up to the Egyptians?
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
The Irony of Moses' Rescue
When the Moses' mother could no longer hide him, she made a tevah (ark) and put him into it. This one of the only two occurrences of tevah in the OT (the other the Noah account). Moses' mother made an ark. Both Noah's ark and Moses' were means of salvation from water. The ark was placed in the reeds by the river bank so that it would not float away. Perhaps there is another element of symbolism in the reeds. Later Moses will lead Israel to the banks of the Sea of Reeds where he will part the waters.
Pharaoh's daughter comes to the river to bathe and finds the baby in the ark. She recognizes that he is a Hebrew. Will she kill the baby and finish the job as her father ordered? No, she has pity on the boy. She commits to the protection and care for the child. How ironic is it that the baby is rescued by the daughter of the very king who ordered his death.
Later, Pharaoh's daughter names the child Moses. Even though his name is Egyptian, she gives a Hebrew etymology. Moshe sounds like the Hebrew word "masha" (to draw out). He is called Moses, because he was "drawn out" of the waters. God said that creation "was good" and Moses' mother said he "was good." Moses was saved by an ark. Moses has already been to the reeds. Does Moses' rescue from the waters anticipate a larger rescue in the future?
Pharaoh's daughter comes to the river to bathe and finds the baby in the ark. She recognizes that he is a Hebrew. Will she kill the baby and finish the job as her father ordered? No, she has pity on the boy. She commits to the protection and care for the child. How ironic is it that the baby is rescued by the daughter of the very king who ordered his death.
Later, Pharaoh's daughter names the child Moses. Even though his name is Egyptian, she gives a Hebrew etymology. Moshe sounds like the Hebrew word "masha" (to draw out). He is called Moses, because he was "drawn out" of the waters. God said that creation "was good" and Moses' mother said he "was good." Moses was saved by an ark. Moses has already been to the reeds. Does Moses' rescue from the waters anticipate a larger rescue in the future?
Thursday, October 30, 2008
An Introduction to Moses
I wish to start a series of short insights into Moses. Let us start by examining why Israel went to Egpyt and the birth of Moses. When Israel’s existence came into jeopardy during the famine of the days of Jacob, Israel found protection and care in the land of their forsaken son Joseph. Israel became fertile in a fertile land (1:9-12). But there arose a new Pharaoh who did not know Joseph. He feared the multitude of the Israelite people and ordered the Hebrew midwives to kill all of the Hebrew boys. After the midwives failed their orders, Pharaoh commanded that all Hebrew boys be thrown into the river. The river that brought life to the land of Egypt is used to bring death Israelite males. But God preserved one of these boys because he had great plans for him.
Two Levites married and bore a son in spite of Pharaoh's efforts to stop Israelite growth. The mother saw that the child "was good." Most English translation comment on the beauty of the boy but this phrase has other significance. The is the same phrase God used to describe each of the six days of creation: "behold it was good." Could there be a connection between the two? Perhaps Moses is another beginning (genesis) and his birth is a new act of creation.
Two Levites married and bore a son in spite of Pharaoh's efforts to stop Israelite growth. The mother saw that the child "was good." Most English translation comment on the beauty of the boy but this phrase has other significance. The is the same phrase God used to describe each of the six days of creation: "behold it was good." Could there be a connection between the two? Perhaps Moses is another beginning (genesis) and his birth is a new act of creation.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Building a House
We learn from Proverbs that God has a special plan for families. Proverbs 24:3-4 gives three tools for housebuilding:
By wisdom a house is built, and by understanding it is established; and by knowledge its rooms are filled with all kinds of costly and pleasant possessions.
When these three tools are applied, there is order in the house. Men are commanded to control their anger. Wise women build a house while foolish women tear it down with their own hands (14:1). Children are to be obedient to their parents instruction (4:1).
The three tools used for housebuilding just happen to be the same 3 tools that God used in creation (3:19-20):
The LORD by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding he established the heavens; by his knowledge the deep [springs] burst open and the dew condenses from the sky.
This suggests that the house is a microcosm of the creative order. So just how important is the family to God? Very important: it is a model of creation!
By wisdom a house is built, and by understanding it is established; and by knowledge its rooms are filled with all kinds of costly and pleasant possessions.
When these three tools are applied, there is order in the house. Men are commanded to control their anger. Wise women build a house while foolish women tear it down with their own hands (14:1). Children are to be obedient to their parents instruction (4:1).
The three tools used for housebuilding just happen to be the same 3 tools that God used in creation (3:19-20):
The LORD by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding he established the heavens; by his knowledge the deep [springs] burst open and the dew condenses from the sky.
This suggests that the house is a microcosm of the creative order. So just how important is the family to God? Very important: it is a model of creation!
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Moses and Paul
Note these remarks by Moses and Paul:
For I know how rebellious and stiffnecked you are! Here, even while I am still alive with you today, you have rebelled against ADONAI; so how much more will you do so after my death? (Deut. 31:27).
Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12)
Let's contrast and compare. Both Paul and Moses received divine commission from the Lord. Moses witnessed the Lord through the burning bush and Paul on the road to Damascus. Both are issuing these words shortly before their deaths. Yet, Moses says that Israel cannot escape the bonds of disobedience, while Paul says the new Israel cannot be contained by the bonds of disobedience. How can two of God's great leaders have such a diametrically opposed message?
What is it about the new Israel that is superior to the Old Israel? Are the nature of the two groups different? NO! Are people in Paul's day inherently better than people of old? NO! Is Paul a better leader than Moses? There is nothing to suggest so. Then what is the difference?
Might I suggest Rom. 1:16. Paul's era has something that gives them more strength. What is so "powerful" about the power of Rom. 1:16 can be seen when we compare the time of Paul with the time of Moses.
Moses experienced the burning bush. He and Israel experienced the 10 plagues and the parting of the Red Sea. The exodus event was such a memorable occassion that it is mentioned repetively in the OT as a reminder that God is devoted to Israel. However, Paul and fellow workers have something even more powerful than the exodus events; they have the Gospel message. Why are Paul's readers so faithful in contrast to Israel of old? They have the Gospel message that is the power unto salvation. It is hard to imagine that a message has more power than 10 plagues and the parting of a sea. And that is the power behind the power. Bu afterall, God's word spoke creation into being, and God's word keeps creation going!
For I know how rebellious and stiffnecked you are! Here, even while I am still alive with you today, you have rebelled against ADONAI; so how much more will you do so after my death? (Deut. 31:27).
Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12)
Let's contrast and compare. Both Paul and Moses received divine commission from the Lord. Moses witnessed the Lord through the burning bush and Paul on the road to Damascus. Both are issuing these words shortly before their deaths. Yet, Moses says that Israel cannot escape the bonds of disobedience, while Paul says the new Israel cannot be contained by the bonds of disobedience. How can two of God's great leaders have such a diametrically opposed message?
What is it about the new Israel that is superior to the Old Israel? Are the nature of the two groups different? NO! Are people in Paul's day inherently better than people of old? NO! Is Paul a better leader than Moses? There is nothing to suggest so. Then what is the difference?
Might I suggest Rom. 1:16. Paul's era has something that gives them more strength. What is so "powerful" about the power of Rom. 1:16 can be seen when we compare the time of Paul with the time of Moses.
Moses experienced the burning bush. He and Israel experienced the 10 plagues and the parting of the Red Sea. The exodus event was such a memorable occassion that it is mentioned repetively in the OT as a reminder that God is devoted to Israel. However, Paul and fellow workers have something even more powerful than the exodus events; they have the Gospel message. Why are Paul's readers so faithful in contrast to Israel of old? They have the Gospel message that is the power unto salvation. It is hard to imagine that a message has more power than 10 plagues and the parting of a sea. And that is the power behind the power. Bu afterall, God's word spoke creation into being, and God's word keeps creation going!
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Well!
Several OT men found their wives at wells.
Rebekah was found for Isaac at a well (Gen. 24).
Jacob found Rachel at the well as the shepherds customarily came together at a certain time of day to water their flocks (Gen. 29). Not only that, but Jacob also flexed his muscles for his future bride to be by lifting the stone off of the well by himself.
When Pharaoh was pursuing Moses, Moses fled to Midian and sat by a well (Ex. 2). Moses came to the rescue of the priest's seven daughters and it was there that he was given Zipporah as a wife.
Jesus was tired and wearied from his labors when he sat by a well in Samaria. There an unmarried woman was drawing water when Jesus asked her for a drink. He promised her a well that would always be full of water. The woman had been married several times, but was "without a husband" at the present time. Obviously, she had not been successful with marriage relationships. It was at the well that Jesus offered her a different kind of relationship.
It is interesting how the marriage relationship is a great metaphor to illustrate the kind of relationship God desires with man. In the instances shown above, think how marriage and wells are blended together. After this study, I will have a deeper appreciation for the message of the song "There's a fountain free." Jesus offered the Samaritan woman a free, always flowing fountain in the form of a relationship. Think how the marriage metaphor and the well motif illustrate the relationship that man can have with God.
For the final lesson. If you are single and still searching for that special someone, try loitering around a well. It worked for several people in the Bible!
Rebekah was found for Isaac at a well (Gen. 24).
Jacob found Rachel at the well as the shepherds customarily came together at a certain time of day to water their flocks (Gen. 29). Not only that, but Jacob also flexed his muscles for his future bride to be by lifting the stone off of the well by himself.
When Pharaoh was pursuing Moses, Moses fled to Midian and sat by a well (Ex. 2). Moses came to the rescue of the priest's seven daughters and it was there that he was given Zipporah as a wife.
Jesus was tired and wearied from his labors when he sat by a well in Samaria. There an unmarried woman was drawing water when Jesus asked her for a drink. He promised her a well that would always be full of water. The woman had been married several times, but was "without a husband" at the present time. Obviously, she had not been successful with marriage relationships. It was at the well that Jesus offered her a different kind of relationship.
It is interesting how the marriage relationship is a great metaphor to illustrate the kind of relationship God desires with man. In the instances shown above, think how marriage and wells are blended together. After this study, I will have a deeper appreciation for the message of the song "There's a fountain free." Jesus offered the Samaritan woman a free, always flowing fountain in the form of a relationship. Think how the marriage metaphor and the well motif illustrate the relationship that man can have with God.
For the final lesson. If you are single and still searching for that special someone, try loitering around a well. It worked for several people in the Bible!
Monday, September 22, 2008
Eglon and Ehud
One of my favorite stories in the OT is that of Ehud and Eglon. A deeper examination into Judges 3.17-29 will reveal that this is a very humorous narrative. As the Israelites once again did evil in the sight of the Lord, God allowed them to be oppressed by the Moabite king Eglon. King Eglon (name means "calf") is described as a very 'fat man' (Judges 3.17). The word for 'fat' is used several times in the OT to refer to a fattened calf or sheep. Later when he is stabbed, the sword was said to be stuck in his 'fat' (heleb); a word that is frequently used in the OT to describe the fat of sacrificed animals (perhaps the author is foreshadowing). The word 'fat' (heleb) is used with 'heart' in Psa. 119.70 and Psa. 73.7 to describe a person who is dull ('fat of mind/eyes'). The Moabite army is also described as being 'fat' (3.29). The author seems to be subtly describing the Moabites as nothing more than big, dumb animals. But what does this say of Israel? For they are even less, since they are subject to the Moabites at this time.
But again Israel cried out and the Lord gave them a deliverer: the left-handed Benjamite Ehud (ironic since Ben-jamin means 'son of the right hand'). Much debate has taken place to the meaning of 'left-handed.' Southpaws were usually considered handicapped in the ancient world (the Hbw word means 'bound in the left hand') but there were examples of left-handed special force soldiers (20.16; 1 Chron. 12.2). It is safe to conclude from the context that Ehud was certainly not handicapped. Under the oppression of the big, dumb Moabites rises a clever leader. He makes a double-edged sword and conceals to his right thigh (no one would check that side since left-handedness was not common). He presented a tribute to the 'fat king' and arranged for a private meeting with Eglon.
Ehud says, 'I have a secret message for you.' (3.19). The Hbw word 'dabar' can mean "word" or "thing." We as readers know exactly what 'secret thing' Ehud has for Eglon; it has two edges. However, dull Eglon does not know so he tells his attendants to be quiet and they left, leaving him even more vulnerable. Ehud reveals that his message is not only secret, it is also divine. As the king rose, Ehud thrust the sword into his belly where it becomes stuck. Ehud quickly escaped and led Israel to victory over the Moabites.
Two lessons emerge from this narrative. First, the 'left-handed son of the right hand' was not weak as we might expect a typical left-hander to be. Rather with the aid of God he was quite strong as his name suggests (Ehud= "strong, united"). Second, there is quite a bit of humor and symbolism in Eglon. When Israel sinned, God handed them over to Eglon, the obese king of Moab. As the narrative progresses he is portrayed as the 'fatted calf' aptly prepared for slaughter. Just as God gave Israel over to him, God also had him taken away. Could it be that he was the fatted calf slaughtered for Israel?
But again Israel cried out and the Lord gave them a deliverer: the left-handed Benjamite Ehud (ironic since Ben-jamin means 'son of the right hand'). Much debate has taken place to the meaning of 'left-handed.' Southpaws were usually considered handicapped in the ancient world (the Hbw word means 'bound in the left hand') but there were examples of left-handed special force soldiers (20.16; 1 Chron. 12.2). It is safe to conclude from the context that Ehud was certainly not handicapped. Under the oppression of the big, dumb Moabites rises a clever leader. He makes a double-edged sword and conceals to his right thigh (no one would check that side since left-handedness was not common). He presented a tribute to the 'fat king' and arranged for a private meeting with Eglon.
Ehud says, 'I have a secret message for you.' (3.19). The Hbw word 'dabar' can mean "word" or "thing." We as readers know exactly what 'secret thing' Ehud has for Eglon; it has two edges. However, dull Eglon does not know so he tells his attendants to be quiet and they left, leaving him even more vulnerable. Ehud reveals that his message is not only secret, it is also divine. As the king rose, Ehud thrust the sword into his belly where it becomes stuck. Ehud quickly escaped and led Israel to victory over the Moabites.
Two lessons emerge from this narrative. First, the 'left-handed son of the right hand' was not weak as we might expect a typical left-hander to be. Rather with the aid of God he was quite strong as his name suggests (Ehud= "strong, united"). Second, there is quite a bit of humor and symbolism in Eglon. When Israel sinned, God handed them over to Eglon, the obese king of Moab. As the narrative progresses he is portrayed as the 'fatted calf' aptly prepared for slaughter. Just as God gave Israel over to him, God also had him taken away. Could it be that he was the fatted calf slaughtered for Israel?
Sunday, September 14, 2008
When we have a situation we have a Savior
The power of God is often best seen in difficult times. Sometimes the power of God is also seen not in hard times but in his promises. Promises that humans have had hard time understanding, but promises that are fulfilled by the Almighty time and time again. Here is a pattern to look for in your textual studies. Problem -> Complication -> Resolution. Let's note some examples:
problem: Sarah is unable to have children (Gen. 11.30)
complication: God promises innumerable seed (13.16; 15.5)
resolution: Isaac is born (21)
Exodus 14
problem: Israel is trapped between the sea and the desert
complication: Pharaoh learns of it and has 2nd thoughts about releasing Israel so he sends his military after them
resolution: Lord divides the Sea
NT theology
problem: everyone has sinned (Rom 3.23)
complication: God so loves the world
resolution: sacrificial death of Jesus
This pattern allows the text to be presented at face value while also offering a convenient homiletic. Most importantly, it draws us to God, the problem solver and Almighty!
problem: Sarah is unable to have children (Gen. 11.30)
complication: God promises innumerable seed (13.16; 15.5)
resolution: Isaac is born (21)
Exodus 14
problem: Israel is trapped between the sea and the desert
complication: Pharaoh learns of it and has 2nd thoughts about releasing Israel so he sends his military after them
resolution: Lord divides the Sea
NT theology
problem: everyone has sinned (Rom 3.23)
complication: God so loves the world
resolution: sacrificial death of Jesus
This pattern allows the text to be presented at face value while also offering a convenient homiletic. Most importantly, it draws us to God, the problem solver and Almighty!
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Glory to Glory
I wonder if there is a theological connection to Ezekiel and Jesus. During the time of Solomon, God's glory had entered the Temple where it dwelt among Israel (1 kgs. 8.10-11) but the height of Israelite history quickly came crashing down after the death of Solomon. Many centuries later, Ezekiel witnessed the glory of God leaving the Jerusalem Temple (10). God had departed because Israel's unrepentant sin and rejection of God's law escalated to such a level that God decided to depart allowing Babylonian destruction and exile.
When Simeon took the young Jesus into his arms to bless him, he declared that: I have seen your salvation, a light for the Gentiles, and GLORY to Israel (Luke 2.30-32). Could there be a connection to Ezekiel? God's glory dwelt among Israel in the Temple. When the people rejected God, his glory left the Temple, and it was destroyed. As Simeon noted, God's glory again dwelt with Israel, this time through Jesus (who calls himself the temple -Jn. 2.19-21). Unfortunately, Israel again rejected God, by rejecting Jesus, and his glory departed (Matt. 27.46), leaving his temple destroyed.
There is definitely a connection, but what does it mean? This time Israel was not faced with a coming exile. The process was reversed; the departure of the glory from Jesus' body actually ended the exile of sin. As Jesus predicted, his Temple was rebuilt in three days because God's new temple is not built with brick and mortar but with spirit. Not only was his body Temple rebuilt, but his death led to the building of God's new dwelling place; the Church!
When Simeon took the young Jesus into his arms to bless him, he declared that: I have seen your salvation, a light for the Gentiles, and GLORY to Israel (Luke 2.30-32). Could there be a connection to Ezekiel? God's glory dwelt among Israel in the Temple. When the people rejected God, his glory left the Temple, and it was destroyed. As Simeon noted, God's glory again dwelt with Israel, this time through Jesus (who calls himself the temple -Jn. 2.19-21). Unfortunately, Israel again rejected God, by rejecting Jesus, and his glory departed (Matt. 27.46), leaving his temple destroyed.
There is definitely a connection, but what does it mean? This time Israel was not faced with a coming exile. The process was reversed; the departure of the glory from Jesus' body actually ended the exile of sin. As Jesus predicted, his Temple was rebuilt in three days because God's new temple is not built with brick and mortar but with spirit. Not only was his body Temple rebuilt, but his death led to the building of God's new dwelling place; the Church!
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Was Jesus created?
Recently I have been discussing the Bible with a group of people who believe that Jesus was created and is not divine as God the father is. Here are a few points that might help in a discussion:
First, the only evidence that they present to suggest that Jesus is created is that he is called the "Son of God" (son must be born or created from father) and the fact that he is called the firstborn of creation (Col. 1.15) and the beginning of creation (Rev. 3.14). In addition, some suggest that Proverbs 8.22 is refering to Jesus, but it is really refering to wisdom (8.12, note the feminine tense).
How literal are "son" and "firstborn" to be interpreted? Israel is called the firstborn son of God (Ex. 4.22). Yet, they were the only child of God. How can an only child be the firstborn? This logic also applies to God's only son Jesus. Paul goes on to say in Col. 1.16 that All things were created by and through Jesus. If all things have been created by Jesus (Jn. 1.3), how could he have been created and where do the scriptures say that he was created? Of course, the NWT adds the word 'all "other" things were created...' John did us a great service in Rev. 3.14 by using the word 'arche' (beginning) because it means the "originator" or "ruler." A little word study on 'arche' puts this argument to rest.
Let's play offense for a moment (other than the John 1.1 debate). God tells Moses that his name is I AM in Ex. 3.14-15. Jesus also calls himself I AM in John 8.58. The NWT translates John 8.58 "I have been" so they say that Jesus is not claiming to be God. If Jesus is not claiming to be YHWH, why then do the Jews seek to stone him in 8.59?
When Jesus is being tempted in Matthew 4.7, he quotes Deut. 6.16 to tell Satan, "You shall not put the LORD your God to the test" Who is being tempted? Jesus. Jesus says that temptation of him is temptation of YHWH. Thus, Jesus equates himself with YHWH. If Jesus is not suggesting that he is the same as YHWH, then what point was he trying to make by quoting Deut. 6.16?
Finally, the NWT translates kurios ("Lord") as Jehovah 237 times in the NT. When kurios applies to Jesus it is not translated 'Jehovah.' How is one to determine whether it is the genreal word 'Lord' or Jehovah since the word is kurios? This proves that the NWT is biased and has left the role of translator and entered the role of a commentator.
The Bible is very clear that Jesus was not created and is thus God; as is the Father and the Spirit. Claiming that Jesus is not God is not only heresy, it will have terrible consequences for your future.
First, the only evidence that they present to suggest that Jesus is created is that he is called the "Son of God" (son must be born or created from father) and the fact that he is called the firstborn of creation (Col. 1.15) and the beginning of creation (Rev. 3.14). In addition, some suggest that Proverbs 8.22 is refering to Jesus, but it is really refering to wisdom (8.12, note the feminine tense).
How literal are "son" and "firstborn" to be interpreted? Israel is called the firstborn son of God (Ex. 4.22). Yet, they were the only child of God. How can an only child be the firstborn? This logic also applies to God's only son Jesus. Paul goes on to say in Col. 1.16 that All things were created by and through Jesus. If all things have been created by Jesus (Jn. 1.3), how could he have been created and where do the scriptures say that he was created? Of course, the NWT adds the word 'all "other" things were created...' John did us a great service in Rev. 3.14 by using the word 'arche' (beginning) because it means the "originator" or "ruler." A little word study on 'arche' puts this argument to rest.
Let's play offense for a moment (other than the John 1.1 debate). God tells Moses that his name is I AM in Ex. 3.14-15. Jesus also calls himself I AM in John 8.58. The NWT translates John 8.58 "I have been" so they say that Jesus is not claiming to be God. If Jesus is not claiming to be YHWH, why then do the Jews seek to stone him in 8.59?
When Jesus is being tempted in Matthew 4.7, he quotes Deut. 6.16 to tell Satan, "You shall not put the LORD your God to the test" Who is being tempted? Jesus. Jesus says that temptation of him is temptation of YHWH. Thus, Jesus equates himself with YHWH. If Jesus is not suggesting that he is the same as YHWH, then what point was he trying to make by quoting Deut. 6.16?
Finally, the NWT translates kurios ("Lord") as Jehovah 237 times in the NT. When kurios applies to Jesus it is not translated 'Jehovah.' How is one to determine whether it is the genreal word 'Lord' or Jehovah since the word is kurios? This proves that the NWT is biased and has left the role of translator and entered the role of a commentator.
The Bible is very clear that Jesus was not created and is thus God; as is the Father and the Spirit. Claiming that Jesus is not God is not only heresy, it will have terrible consequences for your future.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
"Turning" in Jonah
Have you ever wondered what Jonah said in his message that convinced the residents of Nineveh to repent? It is not until 3.4 that we see the actual message Jonah that preached: “In forty days, Nineveh will be overturned!”
What does this message mean? Is it a prophecy or a warning? Let us examine the word “overturned” to better understand Jonah’s message. First, God has overturned cities in the past and it was not a positive experience. The most notable is the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah when God “overturned” all the cities of the plain (Gen. 19.25). This seems to be how Jonah understood the message. When God relented from punishing Nineveh, Jonah became very angry because he wanted Nineveh to be destroyed (4.1-2). His reaction would make a lot of sense if he understood the message to be warning Nineveh of coming destruction. It could also be argued that the residents of Nineveh understood Jonah’s message as a warning. They understood that they were in danger of perishing (3.9).
Is this the only way to interpret “overturned?” Consulting a good lexicon will reveal that the word can also indicate a change, even a spiritual turning. When Saul was informed that he would be the new king of Israel, he was told that the Spirit of God would come upon him and he would be “turned” into another man (1 Sam. 10.6). With this is mind, let us ask: what if Jonah’s message was a prophecy? What if Jonah was proclaiming that the people of Nineveh would be “changed or turned from within” in forty days? Perhaps the residents of Nineveh understood Jonah’s message this way. This would explain why they went to great effort to repent and put on sackcloth (3.5-8). They saw the opportunity to be turned from within. Also, Jonah does not tell the Ninevites why they will be overthrown. If Jonah is pronouncing a prophecy, the absence of a reason for their destruction makes sense.
Perhaps both interpretations are acceptable. It is worth mentioning that Jonah understood the message as an “overturning” even though it resulted in a “turning from within.” Ironically, Jonah did not allow his attitude to be turned. We might even say everyone in the narrative turned (Ninevites and God 3.10) except Jonah. I gleaned a couple of valuable insights from this study. First, is it possible that I am like Jonah and don’t understand the message the same way as those listening? Second, this is a perfect example of why preachers need to be clear communicators. If Jonah was preaching a destructive message, he was vague in his presentation. The Ninevites chose to hear this message as an opportunity. Perhaps we could say that they took Jonah’s message and “overturned” its meaning.
What does this message mean? Is it a prophecy or a warning? Let us examine the word “overturned” to better understand Jonah’s message. First, God has overturned cities in the past and it was not a positive experience. The most notable is the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah when God “overturned” all the cities of the plain (Gen. 19.25). This seems to be how Jonah understood the message. When God relented from punishing Nineveh, Jonah became very angry because he wanted Nineveh to be destroyed (4.1-2). His reaction would make a lot of sense if he understood the message to be warning Nineveh of coming destruction. It could also be argued that the residents of Nineveh understood Jonah’s message as a warning. They understood that they were in danger of perishing (3.9).
Is this the only way to interpret “overturned?” Consulting a good lexicon will reveal that the word can also indicate a change, even a spiritual turning. When Saul was informed that he would be the new king of Israel, he was told that the Spirit of God would come upon him and he would be “turned” into another man (1 Sam. 10.6). With this is mind, let us ask: what if Jonah’s message was a prophecy? What if Jonah was proclaiming that the people of Nineveh would be “changed or turned from within” in forty days? Perhaps the residents of Nineveh understood Jonah’s message this way. This would explain why they went to great effort to repent and put on sackcloth (3.5-8). They saw the opportunity to be turned from within. Also, Jonah does not tell the Ninevites why they will be overthrown. If Jonah is pronouncing a prophecy, the absence of a reason for their destruction makes sense.
Perhaps both interpretations are acceptable. It is worth mentioning that Jonah understood the message as an “overturning” even though it resulted in a “turning from within.” Ironically, Jonah did not allow his attitude to be turned. We might even say everyone in the narrative turned (Ninevites and God 3.10) except Jonah. I gleaned a couple of valuable insights from this study. First, is it possible that I am like Jonah and don’t understand the message the same way as those listening? Second, this is a perfect example of why preachers need to be clear communicators. If Jonah was preaching a destructive message, he was vague in his presentation. The Ninevites chose to hear this message as an opportunity. Perhaps we could say that they took Jonah’s message and “overturned” its meaning.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
How Do I Know My God is Real?
Perhaps this is a question we have all pondered at some time or another. Isaiah has a very interesting section that helps assure Israel the answer to this question. Isaiah 41-48 is a court setting where God has called the entire pantheon of earthly gods together to present their respective case for deity. This section contains 3 fundamental principles that are necessary for deity. God's first challenge implies that a true God can reveal (41.21-24). He demands that the "other gods" reveal the course of human history. Tell the court about the future, tell us about the past, how about you tell us anything. Obviously, they are silent. Not only are they nothing, but it is an abomination to serve such a farce existence (41.24).
The second principle: a true God can create. 44.12-40 contains a detailed account of idol making and worship. I recommend reading it in the Complete Jewish Bible if you have access to that translation. This section describes the labor of a carpenter and a blacksmith as they work with great detail and care to create an idol. Half of the wood used to carve the idol must also be used for heat and cooking. The other half is fashioned and worshipped. The sad disillusionment of this practice is brought out in the CJB: "Not one thinks to himself or has the knowledge or the discernment to say, "I burned half of it in the fire, baked bread on its coals, roasted meat and ate it. Should I now make the rest an abomination? Should I prostrate myself to a tree trunk?" He is relying on ashes! A deceived heart has led him astray; so that now he won't save himself, just won't say, "This thing in my hand is a fraud!" How can that which is made by the hand of man, be the creator of man? A true God is not created, he creates!
The final principle comes from 45.1-4. As the children of Judah were being forewarned about the impending Babylonian exile, Isaiah goes a step further and tells them that God has already planned to deliver them; he even names the person who will deliver them (Cyrus). Not only is this pure predictive prophecy, here lies the last truth that proves YHWH is God. A true God can save. When Isaiah reveals the future exile that Babylonians will go into, he tells how the Babylonians loaded their gods onto beasts in order to save them. These gods do not save, they need saving (46.1-2)! How could a human possibly save deity?
We may not have the same temptation for idol worship as the Ancient Near Eastern world struggled with, but we do face the temptation of placing things above God. How do I know if my God is real? There are 3 fundamental truths that define the nature and ability of an infinite being: What does he reveal? What has he created? Can he save?
The second principle: a true God can create. 44.12-40 contains a detailed account of idol making and worship. I recommend reading it in the Complete Jewish Bible if you have access to that translation. This section describes the labor of a carpenter and a blacksmith as they work with great detail and care to create an idol. Half of the wood used to carve the idol must also be used for heat and cooking. The other half is fashioned and worshipped. The sad disillusionment of this practice is brought out in the CJB: "Not one thinks to himself or has the knowledge or the discernment to say, "I burned half of it in the fire, baked bread on its coals, roasted meat and ate it. Should I now make the rest an abomination? Should I prostrate myself to a tree trunk?" He is relying on ashes! A deceived heart has led him astray; so that now he won't save himself, just won't say, "This thing in my hand is a fraud!" How can that which is made by the hand of man, be the creator of man? A true God is not created, he creates!
The final principle comes from 45.1-4. As the children of Judah were being forewarned about the impending Babylonian exile, Isaiah goes a step further and tells them that God has already planned to deliver them; he even names the person who will deliver them (Cyrus). Not only is this pure predictive prophecy, here lies the last truth that proves YHWH is God. A true God can save. When Isaiah reveals the future exile that Babylonians will go into, he tells how the Babylonians loaded their gods onto beasts in order to save them. These gods do not save, they need saving (46.1-2)! How could a human possibly save deity?
We may not have the same temptation for idol worship as the Ancient Near Eastern world struggled with, but we do face the temptation of placing things above God. How do I know if my God is real? There are 3 fundamental truths that define the nature and ability of an infinite being: What does he reveal? What has he created? Can he save?
Monday, August 4, 2008
The Word of God Shines in All Times
Is it possible to grow up in a godly home and not know God? Is it possible to be part of the Lord's community and not know God? The answer would be Yes! That was just the case in the life of the young Samuel. Samuel grew up in a good home. His parents periodically worshipped the Lord. They met the necessary requirements to purge their sins. They even dedicated Samuel to temple service. Samuel even grew up in the Tabernacle in the service of the priest Eli.
But, in 1 Samuel. 3.7 we are told that Samuel did not yet know the work or person of the Lord. Samuel lived in a time when divine revelation was rare. It was a time of poor spiritual leadership. The Elide dynasty was corrupt and immoral. But the lamp of God had not gone out, both literally and spiritually (3.3). The Lord had great things in mind, through Samuel. Samuel did not need a better family, tabernacle, or teacher, he needed the word of the Lord.
Notice how Samuel progresses as time passes in this narrative. At first, the Lord's word was rare in those days (3.1). However, in one night Samuel came to know the Lord as God spoke to him. The next morning Samuel had something he never had at that point. He had divine knowledge. Yet, he was reluctant to share with Eli because it's message convicted Eli. Even though this message contained judgment, Samuel shared it with Eli. Samuel kept growing in the subsequent days because he kept a relationship with God through his word.
Is it possible to grow up in a Christian home and be a part of the Lord's Church and not know God? Yes! Is it possible to live in a "evangelical society" and have a deficiency in spiritual leadership? Yes. The Samuel narrative teaches us that God remedied Israel's spiritual deficiency and Samuel's relational deficiency with his Word.
But, in 1 Samuel. 3.7 we are told that Samuel did not yet know the work or person of the Lord. Samuel lived in a time when divine revelation was rare. It was a time of poor spiritual leadership. The Elide dynasty was corrupt and immoral. But the lamp of God had not gone out, both literally and spiritually (3.3). The Lord had great things in mind, through Samuel. Samuel did not need a better family, tabernacle, or teacher, he needed the word of the Lord.
Notice how Samuel progresses as time passes in this narrative. At first, the Lord's word was rare in those days (3.1). However, in one night Samuel came to know the Lord as God spoke to him. The next morning Samuel had something he never had at that point. He had divine knowledge. Yet, he was reluctant to share with Eli because it's message convicted Eli. Even though this message contained judgment, Samuel shared it with Eli. Samuel kept growing in the subsequent days because he kept a relationship with God through his word.
Is it possible to grow up in a Christian home and be a part of the Lord's Church and not know God? Yes! Is it possible to live in a "evangelical society" and have a deficiency in spiritual leadership? Yes. The Samuel narrative teaches us that God remedied Israel's spiritual deficiency and Samuel's relational deficiency with his Word.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Tybee Island Last Supper
Today was blazing hot. The sun scorched our flesh, a tsunami soaked our towels and tent but our woes quickly vanished after steak and shrimp at Spanky's restaurant. Perhaps there is an underlying theme of corporal punishment between Tybee's two best restaurants; Spanky's and Fannie's. I was proud to be seen with Steph, she looked mighty good tonight (disclaimer to prevent future implications and argumentations; as she always does).
It is hard to imagine that a week has already passed. Just this time last week, we were staying with my sister after eating out with Landon and Teresa. Let us have a week in review. There was shrimp, shrimp, and more shrimp. I ate it sauteed, fried, steamed, grilled...I guess that's about it. There was plenty of sun and waves. Boogie boarding and Batman.
perhaps the worst part of a vacation is cleaning up and unpacking. I am not looking forward to that. Nor am I looking forward to our trek across the Peach state. No offense but the drive between Macon and Savannah just made my top 3 in worst travels routes (next only to any drive in Arkansas and Mississippi). And the worst travel routes are my all time most hated rankings that I keep up with.
Time has flown by, fun has been abundant, and exhaustion is prevalent. I hope you have enjoyed my first ever vacation blog from good ole Tybee Island, Ga. It has been a memorable week. What location awaits next year is yet to be seen. I will resume normal textual gems sometime in the near future. Ironically, the counter indicates that more people care about my random experience on vacation rather than the textual gems. Perhaps there is something to think about for yours truly. Adios and God bless.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Vacation Day Tango Roger
The clouds were out pretty thick this morning, so Ryan and I decided to go to the movies and watch Dark Knight. I have been an avid Batman fan since childhood. After a couple hours of reflection, this might be the best movie I have ever seen. It has all the marks of a legendary film. It has subtle humor and wit, a terrific soundtrack, one tough character, great lines, a very intelligent and thrilling story, great fights scenes, and non-stop action. Heath Ledger blew me away as the Joker. His character was filled with a twisted intellectual perspective of everything that is terrifyingly evil. The movie was also very deep, full of psychology, philosophy, and ideology. It was one of those movies that you can't stop thinking about.
After we got home the sun was out and we went to the beach. I only stayed for a little while. I have grown a little bored with the beach, so I decided I would actually try to work on a sermon since I do have to return to work Sunday (the work of the Lord is never done). I knocked down 8 chapters of Isaiahic text (deutero-Isaiah as those dirty liberal scholars would call it) in just a few hours. This is the first day that I have had coffee since, well college. The caffine really had the neurons pumping.
We ate at Fannie's again. This time the ladies and children accompanied us. I had, you guessed it, shrimp, this time fried. The best ever, not too much breading and the perfect seasoning. There was also a live band. The kids loved the music. Defintely made my top 5 restaurants after tonight. It was my turn to pay. For an instant, I thought about pulling a Loyd Christmas and telling the waitress that another person would pick up my bill, then I would leave. I even had the person picked out. Then they announced that it was her 89th birthday and I felt it might be inappropriate. Well my mind is tired from exegesis and a great movie. My skin has soaked up plenty of vitamin D. Now it is time for the body to get some rest. It is hard to believe that the week is almost gone. From Tybee Island, Ga; over and out.
After we got home the sun was out and we went to the beach. I only stayed for a little while. I have grown a little bored with the beach, so I decided I would actually try to work on a sermon since I do have to return to work Sunday (the work of the Lord is never done). I knocked down 8 chapters of Isaiahic text (deutero-Isaiah as those dirty liberal scholars would call it) in just a few hours. This is the first day that I have had coffee since, well college. The caffine really had the neurons pumping.
We ate at Fannie's again. This time the ladies and children accompanied us. I had, you guessed it, shrimp, this time fried. The best ever, not too much breading and the perfect seasoning. There was also a live band. The kids loved the music. Defintely made my top 5 restaurants after tonight. It was my turn to pay. For an instant, I thought about pulling a Loyd Christmas and telling the waitress that another person would pick up my bill, then I would leave. I even had the person picked out. Then they announced that it was her 89th birthday and I felt it might be inappropriate. Well my mind is tired from exegesis and a great movie. My skin has soaked up plenty of vitamin D. Now it is time for the body to get some rest. It is hard to believe that the week is almost gone. From Tybee Island, Ga; over and out.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Vacation Wednesday
Today was a fun day. Robbie flew back home today because he has to speak at a summer youth series. The girls took him to the airport so the guys hit the beach. Ryan and I spent the morning riding the waves. We swam with the dolphins and avoided the sting rays. At first, I thought I would scoop a stingray onto my boogie board until Chris reminded me that it was a stingray that brought down the 'Crocodile Hunter' Steve Irwin. The thought of death is probably the one thing that has kept so many people alive in the face of a dare.
The girls left us alone so we went to eat. Today I found a restaurant that easily made my top 5. It is called Fannie's. It is located on the strip in Tybee Island right in front of the pier. We ate on the 2nd story open porch. It was great to view the Atlantic while eating shrimp and crab legs. Today I tried steamed shrimp. Not bad.
This is the first time that my tan line has extended beyond the boundary of my shirt sleeve (commonly known as a 'farmers tan'). I haven't had this kind of sun since I was a lifeguard. This afternoon it was really windy. We had trouble setting up our tent. If it is that windy tomorrow, I am going to make a parachute with the tent fabric and try a new invention; wind boogie boarding. In theory it works, we'll have to see how it does in trials. I think I will depart because the Cards are going to be on ESPN. Naps were scarce for the young'uns so maybe we will all get some sleep tonight. Until tomorrow, good day.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Vacation Tuesday
After two splendid feasts, I have decided that the best decision God ever made came on the 5th day, when God made shrimp. No wonder God said, "It was good." I see why Forrest Gump's friend Bubba was obsessed with them, they are delicious. I had them for lunch, fried and for supper, sauteed. Since we are in Savannah and Steph has become a cult follower of Paula Deen, we decided to eat at her restaurant. Unfortunately, we could not get reservations so we ate at the next closest thing, Paula' s brother's place, Uncle Bubba's Oyster House. If you ever go there I recommend the shrimp dinner with your choice of fried, sauteed, blackened, or grilled shrimp. I also recommend Paula's recipe, Shore is Good Seafood Dip. Robbie and I drew attention to ourselves eating it. Luckily, I have the metabolism of a hummingbird or I would have gained 20 lbs. today.
I have realized how much of a priority that people have placed on tanning. I thought that since it was so popular I would give it a try. Robbie (Ed) and I put our i-pods on, stretched out the beach chairs, put on the sunglasses and immediately the sky grew cloudy. It is a good thing. I am pretty sure we have ADHD and would never be able to just lay there while growing ever hotter. Boogie boarding was a washout today. The tide was too high and the current was really strong, but I did manage to swim with a couple of dolphins for a bit. I am amazed at how much the tide goes out in 2-3 hours. The beach level must drop at least 50 ft. in that period of time.
Addie is a water dog. That little girl absolutely loves the water. We made a sand castle today. It's life span was not long because Addie decided to eat it. A few mouthfuls of sand quickly stopped that train wreck. Steph's tan really makes her glow. She is absolutely gorgeous. All this food has left me exhausted. As the sun sets over the Atlantic, I bid thee farewell. Today's verdict: vacations are not half-bad, hot sand is!
Monday, July 21, 2008
Vacation Day Two
Today I discovered another great to add to my life. Next to steak, sweet tea, power steering, and wireless internet, I have fallen in love with "boogie boarding." This morning my brother in-law, Ryan, and I spent several hours riding waves. I think it waqs divine intervention that I discovered this great art. Two boogie boards just happened to be in our house when we got here, so Ryan and I decided to give it a try. My only regret is that I have not discovered the boogie board earlier. I have always wanted to try surfing, but for now this will do. Addie is having a blast playing in the ocean. She has no fear which gives me great fear for an ever present eye must be with her.
Today we managed to get 3 of 4 kids down at the same time for a nap. I waited all day for that moment only to fall asleep myself. Taking naps in a bed are far better than my office chair. My chair is rather slick and I tend to slide out of it.
Savannah has a really neat river walk area. You can watch giant ships come in, take in a random sax player, and enjoy some fine dining. Tonight we chose the Pirate House an authentic, really old building near downtown. The seafood was delicious.
I have learned that I am probably more exhausted from my first day of vacation than weeks of work. But I don't get to visit the ocean very often. We have had several cuts and sunburns among the group. Ryan even got stung by a jellyfish but it is all part of the price we pay for time away. This is Andy Walker, 10-4 and out.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Vacation Day One
Andy Walker reporting from beautiful Tybee Island, Georgia. This is day one of my first ever vacation (I grew up on a farm and we couldn't leave animals unfed). Our internet service is a little sporadic but I will try and post when I can.
Check out the picture view from my bedroom balcony. Beyond the trees is where the Savannah River meets the Atlantic Ocean. I am on vacation with my in-laws. There are 4 children, age 2 and under; that should be fun! We began today by worshipping with the Central Church of Christ in Savannah, Ga. They are looking for a preacher at the present time (Dale Jenkins take note) and my brother in-law and I got immediate job offers when they learned we were in the ministry.
This afternoon we swam in the ocean and played on the beach. After attending services again at 6 p.m. we enjoyed a fine cuisine from Taco Bell. Tonight I plan to watch the ESPY’s since my childhood buddy Ty Rogers wins an award for his last second shot in the NCAA tournament. My connection is fading. Until tomorrow (if the internet connection allows) blessings to all.
This afternoon we swam in the ocean and played on the beach. After attending services again at 6 p.m. we enjoyed a fine cuisine from Taco Bell. Tonight I plan to watch the ESPY’s since my childhood buddy Ty Rogers wins an award for his last second shot in the NCAA tournament. My connection is fading. Until tomorrow (if the internet connection allows) blessings to all.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Review of Recently Read Books
First, I will be on vacation next week in Savannah, Ga. I have never been on vacation so I plan to blog everyday on how the vacation is going, what books I have read, etc.
Second, I have been to several luncheons lately and amazingly, the topic has been "what are some of the books you have read in the last few months." I will give some good, bad, interesting, etc. Here goes:
Commentaries:
Political:
Preaching:
Other religious books:
This is all for now. Look forward to hearing others' suggestions of good books. I will try to have another post from the beach by Monday.
Second, I have been to several luncheons lately and amazingly, the topic has been "what are some of the books you have read in the last few months." I will give some good, bad, interesting, etc. Here goes:
Commentaries:
- Isaiah by John Oswalt (really good)
- The NT use of the OT commentary edited by Greg Beale (a must have)
- Handbook on the Prophets by Robert Chisholm
Political:
- Rules for Radicals (survey of Saul Alinsky's plan for advancing socialism) (good to learn how radicals think, bad for practice)
- Power to the People by Laura Ingraham (good)
- An Inconvenient Book by Glenn Beck
Preaching:
- From Exegesis to Exposition by Robert Chisholm (great book)
- Preaching and Teaching from the OT by Walter Kaiser (good recommendations)
Other religious books:
- What does the Bible really say? (this is a guide to Jehovah's Witness doctrine that I have been reading through as I study with one of their people) (I learned that Jesus became king in Heaven in 1914 as Daniel 7.13-14 taught ha ha!)
- The Free Church and the Early Church by Williams (not one of my favorites)
- Evangelicals and Tradition by Williams (again not a favorite)
- Walking with those who weep by Ron and Don Williams (very helpful book)
This is all for now. Look forward to hearing others' suggestions of good books. I will try to have another post from the beach by Monday.
Monday, July 7, 2008
Jacob’s dream (Genesis 28)
Dreams are often vehicles for revelation in the OT (Gen. 15.1, 12; 1 Sam. 28.6). This leads us to ask, what is being revealed in Jacob’s dream. First, it is possible to be linked to God. Jacob sees a ladder that is being used by angels as a path between heaven and earth. For Jacob, this path leads to God who renews the Abrahamic covenant with Jacob. Second, God desires to have a relationship with man. He renewed his status as Jacob’s God, he promised possession of the land and innumerable descendants, and he promised security. Thirdly, God is not removed from man. Jacob went to sleep thinking he had the place all to himself but he awoke realizing that he was in the presence of God. He understood two things about “that place:” it is Bethel (“house of God”) and if it is the house of God, it is also the entrance point (gate) of heaven (28.17).
Perhaps Jacob’s dream can give us more insight into Jesus. In John 1.45-51, Jesus references Jacob’s dream in his discussion with Nathanael. Jesus convinces Nathanael that he is the Son of God. Recognizing his divine omniscience, Nathanael confesses belief in Jesus. Jesus promises to display greater things this. "Yes indeed! I tell you that you will see heaven opened and the angels of God going up and coming down on the Son of Man!" (1.51). Jesus is the place of much greater revelation, such revelation of which Jacob could only dream about.
Using Jacob’s dream, Jesus asserts: First, it is possible to be linked to God. Jesus is the ladder. He is the means by which heavenly realities will be brought to earth. Just as Abraham and Jacob mediated God’s blessing to the earth, Jesus will be the seat of blessings to mankind. Second, God desires to have a relationship with man. As Jacob’s dream revealed God’s plan to renew the covenant with Abraham, so God would bring a new covenant with man through Jesus, based also on faith. Finally, God is not removed from man. Jesus is the link between heaven and earth, the gate to heaven, the new Bethel (“house of God”) (John 2.19), and the new Israel. Not only is it possible to have access to God through Jesus, it is possible to see God through Jesus. The best part of it all is that it’s no dream!
Perhaps Jacob’s dream can give us more insight into Jesus. In John 1.45-51, Jesus references Jacob’s dream in his discussion with Nathanael. Jesus convinces Nathanael that he is the Son of God. Recognizing his divine omniscience, Nathanael confesses belief in Jesus. Jesus promises to display greater things this. "Yes indeed! I tell you that you will see heaven opened and the angels of God going up and coming down on the Son of Man!" (1.51). Jesus is the place of much greater revelation, such revelation of which Jacob could only dream about.
Using Jacob’s dream, Jesus asserts: First, it is possible to be linked to God. Jesus is the ladder. He is the means by which heavenly realities will be brought to earth. Just as Abraham and Jacob mediated God’s blessing to the earth, Jesus will be the seat of blessings to mankind. Second, God desires to have a relationship with man. As Jacob’s dream revealed God’s plan to renew the covenant with Abraham, so God would bring a new covenant with man through Jesus, based also on faith. Finally, God is not removed from man. Jesus is the link between heaven and earth, the gate to heaven, the new Bethel (“house of God”) (John 2.19), and the new Israel. Not only is it possible to have access to God through Jesus, it is possible to see God through Jesus. The best part of it all is that it’s no dream!
Friday, June 27, 2008
It's Good!
During the creation narrative of Genesis chapters one through three, it is expressed several times that God described his work as (tov) "good" (1.4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25). Following the sixth day, God reflects on his creation and it was "very good" or "perfect" (1.31).
God looks down on his creation in 2.18 and notes something that is "not good." It is not good that man be alone. So God decided to create for him a helper. Perhaps there are a couple of things to reflect upon God's declaration that something is not good.
First, we see that man was in need of something to complete him and give him function. The sky had it luminaries and birds, the sea had its fish, the earth had man and the animals, even the animals had their counterparts, but man had none. God made woman as a "helper" (ezer) for man. When Samuel led Israel to return to the Lord, the people repented at Mizpah by pouring water and fasting (1 Sam. 7.4-6). During the midst of this ritual the Philistines tried to attack them but God intervened and defeated their ranks. Samuel set up a stone and named it "Ebenezer" ("stone of help") because the Lord helped us. The Lord was Israel's "helper" (ezer). God is Israel's creator and helper, woman is man's helper; made for him and from him. God helped Israel by delivering them from the Philistines whereas woman helps man by delivering him from being alone.
Second, we can clearly see the sanctity of marriage. On their own, man or woman is only half of the equation but when they intend on marriage they become one.
Finally, any union that is not man and woman is also "not good." My great uncle Ed was a plumber and philosopher at heart. He used to take two male pipe fittings and try to join them, then he would do the same with female fittings, to no avail. In all of his wisdom he would say, "If it don't work in plumbing, it sure ain't gonna work in life!" Notice that God decides what a suitable helper is (2.18, 20), not man! As creator, God knows what is perfect and what is not. When a man and woman decide to commit and consummate in a lifetime of love, there is only way one to describe it; "it is good."
God looks down on his creation in 2.18 and notes something that is "not good." It is not good that man be alone. So God decided to create for him a helper. Perhaps there are a couple of things to reflect upon God's declaration that something is not good.
First, we see that man was in need of something to complete him and give him function. The sky had it luminaries and birds, the sea had its fish, the earth had man and the animals, even the animals had their counterparts, but man had none. God made woman as a "helper" (ezer) for man. When Samuel led Israel to return to the Lord, the people repented at Mizpah by pouring water and fasting (1 Sam. 7.4-6). During the midst of this ritual the Philistines tried to attack them but God intervened and defeated their ranks. Samuel set up a stone and named it "Ebenezer" ("stone of help") because the Lord helped us. The Lord was Israel's "helper" (ezer). God is Israel's creator and helper, woman is man's helper; made for him and from him. God helped Israel by delivering them from the Philistines whereas woman helps man by delivering him from being alone.
Second, we can clearly see the sanctity of marriage. On their own, man or woman is only half of the equation but when they intend on marriage they become one.
Finally, any union that is not man and woman is also "not good." My great uncle Ed was a plumber and philosopher at heart. He used to take two male pipe fittings and try to join them, then he would do the same with female fittings, to no avail. In all of his wisdom he would say, "If it don't work in plumbing, it sure ain't gonna work in life!" Notice that God decides what a suitable helper is (2.18, 20), not man! As creator, God knows what is perfect and what is not. When a man and woman decide to commit and consummate in a lifetime of love, there is only way one to describe it; "it is good."
Sunday, June 22, 2008
Either way God is looking
It's that time of the year when I spend several weeks at the local church camp. I am sorry for the delay in posts but here is a small morsel to satisfy the hungry soul.
Hosea is a wonderful, yet often overlooked book of the OT. The primary message is centered around the marriage metaphor and Israel's spiritual adultery against God. The book has 5 sections each beginning with a warning of judgment and each ending with a promise of salvation. I want to focus on a wordplay in 13.7 (judgment section) and 14.8 (salvation).
So now I have become like a lion to them; like a leopard I will lurk by the road (13.7)
O Ephraim, what more have I to do with idols? I will answer him and care for him. I am like a green pine tree; your fruitfulness comes from me (14.8)
The bold words in each text are highlighted because they are the same Hebrew word (shur). The first is a threat to unpenitent Israel that God's judgment is like a lurking lion or leopard waiting for ambush while the second is a promise that God will take care of Israel if they repent and turn back to him. A sinful Israel will experience God as a lurking predator while a penitent Israel would experience God as a caring protector. Either way God is looking, it depends on us as to what kind of looking he does!
Hosea is a wonderful, yet often overlooked book of the OT. The primary message is centered around the marriage metaphor and Israel's spiritual adultery against God. The book has 5 sections each beginning with a warning of judgment and each ending with a promise of salvation. I want to focus on a wordplay in 13.7 (judgment section) and 14.8 (salvation).
So now I have become like a lion to them; like a leopard I will lurk by the road (13.7)
O Ephraim, what more have I to do with idols? I will answer him and care for him. I am like a green pine tree; your fruitfulness comes from me (14.8)
The bold words in each text are highlighted because they are the same Hebrew word (shur). The first is a threat to unpenitent Israel that God's judgment is like a lurking lion or leopard waiting for ambush while the second is a promise that God will take care of Israel if they repent and turn back to him. A sinful Israel will experience God as a lurking predator while a penitent Israel would experience God as a caring protector. Either way God is looking, it depends on us as to what kind of looking he does!
Monday, June 9, 2008
Putting your prayer into Practice
Boaz is one example of a Biblical character who unknowingly answered his own petition. After Ruth and Naomi returned to Bethlehem from Moab, they were in a desperate situation being poor widows. Ruth proved her devotion and love for Naomi by taking on the responsibility of gleaning in Israelite fields for grain. The author of Ruth applies a tongue-in-cheek commentary on Ruth’s territorial selection: “It just so happened that she came to the field of Boaz” (2.3), who is a relative of Elimelech (2.1). Boaz asked one of his foremen about Ruth (2.5). The foreman knows her background; she is from Moab. He knows her situation; she has returned with Naomi (2.6). He knows what she wants; she has asked to glean. He knows her dedication; she has only rested for a short while (2.7).
Boaz not only grants Ruth permission, he demands that she only glean in his fields. Ruth is overwhelmed by Boaz’s generosity and asks, why are you paying attention to me, a foreigner? He acknowledges what she has done for Naomi and offers a blessing in the form of a petition (Hebrew jussive) to the Lord: “May Adonai reward you for what you've done; may you be rewarded in full by Adonai, the God of Israel, under whose wings (kanaph) you have come for refuge." Boaz portrays the Lord as a mother hen caring and securing her young.
Naomi devises a plan by which Ruth will persuade Boaz to take on the role of kinsman redeemer and marry her. Ruth is to go to the threshing floor as Boaz is sleeping and uncover his feet. Ruth is to lay by them waiting for Boaz’s reaction. Boaz woke up and asked, “Who are you?”
Ruth insists that Boaz “Spread your cover (kanaph) over your handmaid (which also symbolized taking a wife), because you are a redeeming kinsman." This is the very same word from 2.12 where Boaz says, May Adonai reward you…under whose wings (kanaph) you have come for refuge." Ruth asks Boaz to answer his own prayer and be a wing of refuge. Boaz accepts and the rest of narrative reveals that Boaz became Ruth and Naomi’s kinsman redeemer. Boaz was a man of means. It just so happened that Ruth chose his fields to glean in. Boaz prays that Ruth will find refuge under the wings of God, but little did he know that he was the one who would spread open those wings of refuge for Ruth. Boaz is the very one who will provide care and security by marrying Ruth. Lesson: When you pray, don’t be surprised if God uses you to answer your own prayer!
Boaz not only grants Ruth permission, he demands that she only glean in his fields. Ruth is overwhelmed by Boaz’s generosity and asks, why are you paying attention to me, a foreigner? He acknowledges what she has done for Naomi and offers a blessing in the form of a petition (Hebrew jussive) to the Lord: “May Adonai reward you for what you've done; may you be rewarded in full by Adonai, the God of Israel, under whose wings (kanaph) you have come for refuge." Boaz portrays the Lord as a mother hen caring and securing her young.
Naomi devises a plan by which Ruth will persuade Boaz to take on the role of kinsman redeemer and marry her. Ruth is to go to the threshing floor as Boaz is sleeping and uncover his feet. Ruth is to lay by them waiting for Boaz’s reaction. Boaz woke up and asked, “Who are you?”
Ruth insists that Boaz “Spread your cover (kanaph) over your handmaid (which also symbolized taking a wife), because you are a redeeming kinsman." This is the very same word from 2.12 where Boaz says, May Adonai reward you…under whose wings (kanaph) you have come for refuge." Ruth asks Boaz to answer his own prayer and be a wing of refuge. Boaz accepts and the rest of narrative reveals that Boaz became Ruth and Naomi’s kinsman redeemer. Boaz was a man of means. It just so happened that Ruth chose his fields to glean in. Boaz prays that Ruth will find refuge under the wings of God, but little did he know that he was the one who would spread open those wings of refuge for Ruth. Boaz is the very one who will provide care and security by marrying Ruth. Lesson: When you pray, don’t be surprised if God uses you to answer your own prayer!
Monday, June 2, 2008
God can do great things, even with mistakes
The first chapter of Ruth is full of wonderful material. Sometime during the course of the Judges period, there was a famine in Bethlehem. This time of Israelite history was characterized by moral relativism and sin (21.25). Moses had stipulated that the Lord would respond to rebellious sin with curses (Deut. 28.15-69), one being famine. It is possible that divine sanction is behind the shortage of food. The irony is that Bethlehem means “house of bread” and there is no bread. Elimelech (“God is my king”) and his wife, Naomi (“pleasant”) decide that it would be better to live in an enemy land than a land without food, so they journey to Moab. Of all the places to travel, Moab might possibly be the worst choice for an Israelite. While there, their two sons Mahlon (“weakling”) and Chilion (“sickling”) marry Moabite women, something the Lord had spoken against (Ex. 34.16).
Sometime within the next decade, Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion all died leaving Ruth, Orpah, and Naomi as widows. Naomi hears that the Lord had provided food for Judah and she decides to “turn” home. After much discussion, Ruth is finally allowed to return with Naomi. Ruth pledges allegiance to Naomi, Israel, and YHWH (1.16).
Naomi returns to Bethlehem not under her given name (“pleasant”), she is Mara (“bitter”). She feels that the hand of the Lord has been against her and made her empty. Who is to blame for Naomi’s situation? Ruth and Naomi return during the harvest of the year. This last sentence completes an inclusio that can be seen in the original language. Elimelech and Naomi left the “house of bread” because there was no “bread” when Naomi returned to the “house of bread” there was “bread.”
There are a couple of important lessons that we can learn from this chapter. First, there was no need to leave the Promised Land, there was need to turn to the Lord. Elimelech sought blessings outside of the Promised Land and all he found was death. Rather than turning to the Lord, they wandered farther into disobedience and death. Second, God can take mistakes and do great things with them. If Elimelech and Naomi had not gone to Moab, Ruth would not have returned to Judah. If Ruth had not returned she would not have married Boaz. If she had not married Boaz, David would not have been born. Thus we learn that David’s kingship was not the result of clever political skills, fighting ability, or individual power, it was the result of the providence of God and a great-grandmother who was dedicated to God, God's people, and her family!
Sometime within the next decade, Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion all died leaving Ruth, Orpah, and Naomi as widows. Naomi hears that the Lord had provided food for Judah and she decides to “turn” home. After much discussion, Ruth is finally allowed to return with Naomi. Ruth pledges allegiance to Naomi, Israel, and YHWH (1.16).
Naomi returns to Bethlehem not under her given name (“pleasant”), she is Mara (“bitter”). She feels that the hand of the Lord has been against her and made her empty. Who is to blame for Naomi’s situation? Ruth and Naomi return during the harvest of the year. This last sentence completes an inclusio that can be seen in the original language. Elimelech and Naomi left the “house of bread” because there was no “bread” when Naomi returned to the “house of bread” there was “bread.”
There are a couple of important lessons that we can learn from this chapter. First, there was no need to leave the Promised Land, there was need to turn to the Lord. Elimelech sought blessings outside of the Promised Land and all he found was death. Rather than turning to the Lord, they wandered farther into disobedience and death. Second, God can take mistakes and do great things with them. If Elimelech and Naomi had not gone to Moab, Ruth would not have returned to Judah. If Ruth had not returned she would not have married Boaz. If she had not married Boaz, David would not have been born. Thus we learn that David’s kingship was not the result of clever political skills, fighting ability, or individual power, it was the result of the providence of God and a great-grandmother who was dedicated to God, God's people, and her family!
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
He who has ears let him hear
Years before Josiah's birth, a prophet was sent by God to king Jeroboam. He cried out against the altar which Jeroboam had built and proclaimed that the Lord would raise up a descendant of David, named Josiah. Josiah would institute reforms that would level the idolatrous high places and false worship that Jeroboam had introduced to God’s people (1 Kgs. 13.1ff). At eight years of age Josiah, the 2nd David, began to reign in Jerusalem. It is customary for the author of the Kings to give an evaluation of the king and his reign. Josiah receives more praise and commendation than any of the OT kings (2 Kgs. 22.2). “He did what was right from ADONAI's perspective, living entirely in the manner of David his ancestor and turning away neither to the right nor to the left” (CJB).
Why did Josiah live so godly in a time when Judah had strayed so far away from the Lord? The answer may be found in the Hebrew word "shama." This word is a very common word in the book of Deuteronomy and this connection is one of the reasons scholars often call this section of scripture Deuteronomistic History. Shama can have several meanings and many derivatives, all of which are connected to the idea of hearing. Shama can mean to “hear, listen, accept, understand, and obey.” Knowledge of shama might help us understand why Josiah received such high marks as the king of Judah.
During the eighteenth year of his reign, Josiah commissioned the renovation of the Temple. Hilkiah, the high priest found the book of the Torah in the Temple (2 Kgs. 22.8). Hilkiah sent word to the king through the scribe Shaphan and Shaphan read it to the king (22.10). Josiah “heard” (shama) the word of the Lord and tore his clothes (22.11). Josiah sent Hilkiah to inquire the Lord in behalf of himself, the people, and all Judah what they must do since they have invoked the wrath of the Lord. The Lord’s wrath is great because the people haven’t “listened” (shama) to the words in the book (22.13).
The Lord’s response was not pleasant for Judah. They would fall into captivity, but there would be good news for Josiah. Since Josiah has “heard” the words of God, God has “heard” him (22.18-19). The lesson: Why did Josiah do what was right and walk in the ways of David? He was willing to “hear” God. The result of hearing God was that God heard him and promised that he would go to death in peace. Hearing God has a two-fold effect: God will hear us and assurance even in death!
Why did Josiah live so godly in a time when Judah had strayed so far away from the Lord? The answer may be found in the Hebrew word "shama." This word is a very common word in the book of Deuteronomy and this connection is one of the reasons scholars often call this section of scripture Deuteronomistic History. Shama can have several meanings and many derivatives, all of which are connected to the idea of hearing. Shama can mean to “hear, listen, accept, understand, and obey.” Knowledge of shama might help us understand why Josiah received such high marks as the king of Judah.
During the eighteenth year of his reign, Josiah commissioned the renovation of the Temple. Hilkiah, the high priest found the book of the Torah in the Temple (2 Kgs. 22.8). Hilkiah sent word to the king through the scribe Shaphan and Shaphan read it to the king (22.10). Josiah “heard” (shama) the word of the Lord and tore his clothes (22.11). Josiah sent Hilkiah to inquire the Lord in behalf of himself, the people, and all Judah what they must do since they have invoked the wrath of the Lord. The Lord’s wrath is great because the people haven’t “listened” (shama) to the words in the book (22.13).
The Lord’s response was not pleasant for Judah. They would fall into captivity, but there would be good news for Josiah. Since Josiah has “heard” the words of God, God has “heard” him (22.18-19). The lesson: Why did Josiah do what was right and walk in the ways of David? He was willing to “hear” God. The result of hearing God was that God heard him and promised that he would go to death in peace. Hearing God has a two-fold effect: God will hear us and assurance even in death!
Monday, May 19, 2008
It Just So Happened
The canonicity of the book of Esther has always been in question. The primary reason is because God is never mentioned in the narrative. Even though God is never mentioned in the book of Esther, the author cleverly disguises the presence of God with literary sarcasm and kismet.
The narrative begins when king Ahasuerus has a banquet. After several drinks he demands that his wife Vashti come out and display her beauty to the other men. It just happened that Vashti refused (1.11-12). The king decided to dispose of his wife and seek another wife. It just so happened that Esther was very beautiful (2.7). Esther’s beauty did not go unnoticed, King Ahasuerus thought her so beautiful that he made Esther queen.
One day Esther’s uncle, Mordecai just happened to be sitting at the king’s gate, when he “learned” that two of the king’s eunuchs were conspiring to kill the king (2.21-23). Mordecai told Esther of the plot and she told the king and it was written in the records.
The king happened to appoint Haman the Agagite as his second in command. The Agagites and the Jews had a long and dark history. The Agagites were the first nation to attack God’s newly formed covenant people. God had promised to erase their memory from the earth (Ex. 17.8-16). Perhaps this bad history is what prevented Mordecai from paying the proper respect to Haman (3.2). From that day, Haman made it his personal ambition to have Mordecai and all the Jews of the empire killed.
Haman’s self-worth had begun to grow. He had been promoted, he alone had been asked to dine with the king and queen, and everyone was paying him great respect, that is, except for Mordecai. Haman had gallows constructed to put Mordecai to death. The next day he would dine with the king and request that Mordecai be hung. But it just so happened that the king could not sleep that night and decided to review the records. He learned that Mordecai had uncovered the conspiracy. About that time, Haman just happened to come into the king’s presence to demand that Mordecai be put to death. The king asked Haman, “what should be done to the man who delights the king?” Haman thinking that he was the man said the man should wear the king’s crown, robe, and he should be allowed to ride the king’s horse. The king told Haman to see that such an honor was bestowed upon Mordecai.
Esther finally told the king of the plot to kill the Jews. As the king was deciding the fate of Haman, it just so happened that Harbona, one of the king’s attendants, looked out the window and saw the gallows that Haman had constructed to kill Mordecai (7.9-10). Haman’s instrument of death literally killed him. Mordecai was exonerated and all the Jews of the land were spared. Perhaps there is good reason why the ancient readers accepted Esther. God’s work can be seen even when his name is not!
The narrative begins when king Ahasuerus has a banquet. After several drinks he demands that his wife Vashti come out and display her beauty to the other men. It just happened that Vashti refused (1.11-12). The king decided to dispose of his wife and seek another wife. It just so happened that Esther was very beautiful (2.7). Esther’s beauty did not go unnoticed, King Ahasuerus thought her so beautiful that he made Esther queen.
One day Esther’s uncle, Mordecai just happened to be sitting at the king’s gate, when he “learned” that two of the king’s eunuchs were conspiring to kill the king (2.21-23). Mordecai told Esther of the plot and she told the king and it was written in the records.
The king happened to appoint Haman the Agagite as his second in command. The Agagites and the Jews had a long and dark history. The Agagites were the first nation to attack God’s newly formed covenant people. God had promised to erase their memory from the earth (Ex. 17.8-16). Perhaps this bad history is what prevented Mordecai from paying the proper respect to Haman (3.2). From that day, Haman made it his personal ambition to have Mordecai and all the Jews of the empire killed.
Haman’s self-worth had begun to grow. He had been promoted, he alone had been asked to dine with the king and queen, and everyone was paying him great respect, that is, except for Mordecai. Haman had gallows constructed to put Mordecai to death. The next day he would dine with the king and request that Mordecai be hung. But it just so happened that the king could not sleep that night and decided to review the records. He learned that Mordecai had uncovered the conspiracy. About that time, Haman just happened to come into the king’s presence to demand that Mordecai be put to death. The king asked Haman, “what should be done to the man who delights the king?” Haman thinking that he was the man said the man should wear the king’s crown, robe, and he should be allowed to ride the king’s horse. The king told Haman to see that such an honor was bestowed upon Mordecai.
Esther finally told the king of the plot to kill the Jews. As the king was deciding the fate of Haman, it just so happened that Harbona, one of the king’s attendants, looked out the window and saw the gallows that Haman had constructed to kill Mordecai (7.9-10). Haman’s instrument of death literally killed him. Mordecai was exonerated and all the Jews of the land were spared. Perhaps there is good reason why the ancient readers accepted Esther. God’s work can be seen even when his name is not!
Friday, May 9, 2008
Mommas don't let your babies grow up in the time of the Judges
Since Mother's day is only a few days away, I thought it would be fitting to look at 3 mothers during the period of the Judges. Judges 13:2, 17:1, and 1 Samuel 1:1 all begin with the same formula: "Now there was a certain man from _____ whose name was ______." These are the only OT occasions for this formula except 1 Sam. 9.1. Perhaps we should compare these 3 occasions since they occur in the period of the Judges and understand the first two examples as contrasts for the third.
Samson's mother miraculously conceived and bore a son. There are many allusions from other significant OT texts that foreshadow the extraordinary character that Samson was to be. Samson's mother was barren as was Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel. An angel appears to Samson's parents as one appeared to Abraham and Sarah. A nazarite vow is pronounced from birth. Samson's parents ask the angel to reveal his name as Jacob did in Gen. 32. It seems that God has invested a lot in the birth of Samson. Yet, Samson and his parents seemed to have trouble understanding his role as deliverer of Israel and thus he never became an effective leader. He led no Israelite into battle, he married Philistines women, he violated all 3 of the Nazarite vows, stayed with a foreign prostitute, and sought a life of personal vendetta. Samson may be the greatest disappointment in all of scripture.
In Judges 17, Micah's mother becomes obsessed with idols. Micah means "who is like the Lord?" (implication is that no one is like the Lord) yet his mother tries to have a carved image "like the Lord." Micah eventually made himself an ephod, made idols, and even made his own priest, all of which led to the Danites own unauthorized cult. Where did Micah learn his bad habits?
Contra these men with Samuel. His mother Hannah is also barren. She prays to the Lord for a son and vows to give him back to the Lord in service. His mother worships the Lord and offers sacrifices at Shiloh every year. His mother is true to her word and gives Samuel to the Lord's temple service. When trouble overtakes her, she seeks the Lord's help. Hannah's son led to wonderful changes. The word of the Lord returned to Israel (3.1). The priesthood was purified, and Israel revived its genuine worship of YHWH through the spiritual leadership of Samuel.
Lesson: Mothers have powerful influence. Effective mothers can produce national results. Happy Mother's Day!!!
Samson's mother miraculously conceived and bore a son. There are many allusions from other significant OT texts that foreshadow the extraordinary character that Samson was to be. Samson's mother was barren as was Sarah, Rebekah, and Rachel. An angel appears to Samson's parents as one appeared to Abraham and Sarah. A nazarite vow is pronounced from birth. Samson's parents ask the angel to reveal his name as Jacob did in Gen. 32. It seems that God has invested a lot in the birth of Samson. Yet, Samson and his parents seemed to have trouble understanding his role as deliverer of Israel and thus he never became an effective leader. He led no Israelite into battle, he married Philistines women, he violated all 3 of the Nazarite vows, stayed with a foreign prostitute, and sought a life of personal vendetta. Samson may be the greatest disappointment in all of scripture.
In Judges 17, Micah's mother becomes obsessed with idols. Micah means "who is like the Lord?" (implication is that no one is like the Lord) yet his mother tries to have a carved image "like the Lord." Micah eventually made himself an ephod, made idols, and even made his own priest, all of which led to the Danites own unauthorized cult. Where did Micah learn his bad habits?
Contra these men with Samuel. His mother Hannah is also barren. She prays to the Lord for a son and vows to give him back to the Lord in service. His mother worships the Lord and offers sacrifices at Shiloh every year. His mother is true to her word and gives Samuel to the Lord's temple service. When trouble overtakes her, she seeks the Lord's help. Hannah's son led to wonderful changes. The word of the Lord returned to Israel (3.1). The priesthood was purified, and Israel revived its genuine worship of YHWH through the spiritual leadership of Samuel.
Lesson: Mothers have powerful influence. Effective mothers can produce national results. Happy Mother's Day!!!
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Jesus the King
Perhaps we can gain further understanding of Jesus’ baptism by looking to the first Old Testament kings. The title “Messiah” or “anointed one” gained significance during the time of Samuel. God's first "anointed ones" were kings. Israel asked for a king like the other nations (1 Sam. 8.5). God was disappointed that the people had rejected him, but granted them Saul. Saul's failure led to the anointing of a true king, one who sought after God's own heart (16.1). If we examine how one came to be God's "anointed one" it could give us further insight into God’s ultimate “anointed one.” There seems to be four common characteristics that were foundational to the kingship of Saul and David. Both were divinely selected (9.17; 16.1, 12), both were anointed by a prophet (10.1; 16.13), both kings received God’s spirit (10.6-13; 16.13), and both kings were publicly acknowledged as being chosen of God (11.15; 2 Sam. 4.2).
Matthew’s account of Jesus’ immersion has four similar characteristics to the anointing of Saul and David. John was preaching in the wilderness of Judea preparing the people for the one whom God had selected. Jesus appeared and was immersed by the prophet John (3.13-16). The spirit of God descended on him in the form of a dove (3.16). God publicly acknowledged him (3.17). Immediately after his immersion, Jesus proved to be the true king and spiritual leader by overcoming a period of temptation in the wilderness, something ancient Israel was unable to do. Perhaps we can view Jesus’ immersion as his anointing as God’s true king.
There is a great lesson to learn from this. God can take our mistakes and do great things with them. Israel’s request for a king was a rejection of God. But God does not allow man to frustrate his will. Rather than trust in God’s promises, Israel wanted to trust in a human king. God molded the idea of a king into his will for man. God would bring salvation to mankind through a king (Matt. 27.11; John 1.49). Who else, but God, could take a means of rejection and turn it into a means of salvation?
Matthew’s account of Jesus’ immersion has four similar characteristics to the anointing of Saul and David. John was preaching in the wilderness of Judea preparing the people for the one whom God had selected. Jesus appeared and was immersed by the prophet John (3.13-16). The spirit of God descended on him in the form of a dove (3.16). God publicly acknowledged him (3.17). Immediately after his immersion, Jesus proved to be the true king and spiritual leader by overcoming a period of temptation in the wilderness, something ancient Israel was unable to do. Perhaps we can view Jesus’ immersion as his anointing as God’s true king.
There is a great lesson to learn from this. God can take our mistakes and do great things with them. Israel’s request for a king was a rejection of God. But God does not allow man to frustrate his will. Rather than trust in God’s promises, Israel wanted to trust in a human king. God molded the idea of a king into his will for man. God would bring salvation to mankind through a king (Matt. 27.11; John 1.49). Who else, but God, could take a means of rejection and turn it into a means of salvation?
Friday, April 18, 2008
YHWH immo
Shortly after the anointing of David, the author of 1 Samuel switches the narrative to Saul. It is easy to understand why. David has received the spirit of the Lord as it has departed from Saul (1 Sam. 16.13-14). The text tells us that Saul is tormented by a bad spirit from God. One of his courtiers recommends music to soothe his condition. Saul asks for recommendations and the servant refers David, the son of Jesse. The servant’s description of David would make a wonderful resume (1 Samuel 16.18). His first hand knowledge of David demands that he has some kind of relationship to Jesse’s family. David is a skilled musician. He is a brave man, able to fight. He chooses his words wisely and is good looking. These are fine attributes but perhaps the last one is the most impressive: “YHWH immo.” The LORD is with him!
The servant does not use the Hebrew title “El” (God), but the personal name of Israel’s God, YHWH. This is the same God who created the heavens and the earth. Who was with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is the God who took care of Joseph. The God who summoned Moses to lead Israel out of Egypt with the mighty help of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea. The God who made a covenant with Israel and kept it even though Israel sinned (Ex. 34.6). The God who defeated Dagon. Now the same God is with David.
Could there be a greater characteristic in one’s life than this? I can’t speak for you but perhaps there is no greater epitaph for a person than to say, “The Lord was with him.” When I die, I hope I have lived in a way that someone will say, “The Lord was with him and now he is with the Lord.”
The servant does not use the Hebrew title “El” (God), but the personal name of Israel’s God, YHWH. This is the same God who created the heavens and the earth. Who was with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It is the God who took care of Joseph. The God who summoned Moses to lead Israel out of Egypt with the mighty help of plagues and the parting of the Red Sea. The God who made a covenant with Israel and kept it even though Israel sinned (Ex. 34.6). The God who defeated Dagon. Now the same God is with David.
Could there be a greater characteristic in one’s life than this? I can’t speak for you but perhaps there is no greater epitaph for a person than to say, “The Lord was with him.” When I die, I hope I have lived in a way that someone will say, “The Lord was with him and now he is with the Lord.”
Friday, April 11, 2008
Dancing Between Opinions
Before the great contest on Mount Carmel, the prophet Elijah rebuked Israel with a question: “how long will you limp along on two opinions?” (1 Kgs. 18.21). Israel was trying to worship both God and the Canaanite god Baal. Ahab married the Sidonian princess Jezebel and had sanctioned her god Baal to be worshipped. The purpose of his question was to force a decision among the people who refused to decide. “Limping” was evidently a cultic dance in celebration of Baal. When the contest of Mount Carmel began, the prophets of Baal began to “limp/dance” around the altar (18.26). Elijah asks the people are you going to dance YHWH’s dance or Baal’s? The response of the people was silence (18.21). The last thing these people want to do is decide. The contest will have to answer Elijah’s question.
As the prophets of Baal have prepared the sacrifice, altar, and have begun their ritual dance, there is no voice, no answer (18.26). With sarcasm, Elijah responds “Shout louder! After all, he's a god, isn't he? Maybe he's daydreaming, or he's on the potty, or he's away on a trip. Maybe he's asleep, and you have to wake him up (CJB).” Since Baal was the god of rain and storms (fertility), the ANE peoples believed that Baal had been killed by the death god Mot whenever there was a drought. The people would cut themselves hoping that their spilt blood would encourage Mot to release Baal. The prophets began slashing themselves hoping that Baal would answer them, but there was no voice, no answer, and no response (18.29).
When it was Elijah’s turn, he prepared the altar, prayed to God, and doused the altar with water. Fire from heaven came down and devoured the offering and even the water. The people came to the conclusion that YHWH is God, YHWH is God (18.39). No longer are there “two opinions.” Not only did God win that day, but the people won as God sent rain to bless the land.
Perhaps there are a couple of lessons that we can learn. God is mutually exclusive. You cannot be whole heartedly devoted to two things (Rev. 3.16). Next, God helped the people believe. From Abraham, to Jacob, to king Ahaz, God often went out of his way to help people believe in him. Finally, life comes from having God as our one opinion. The followers of Baal got death (18.40). In this narrative, one’s opinion really did matter!
As the prophets of Baal have prepared the sacrifice, altar, and have begun their ritual dance, there is no voice, no answer (18.26). With sarcasm, Elijah responds “Shout louder! After all, he's a god, isn't he? Maybe he's daydreaming, or he's on the potty, or he's away on a trip. Maybe he's asleep, and you have to wake him up (CJB).” Since Baal was the god of rain and storms (fertility), the ANE peoples believed that Baal had been killed by the death god Mot whenever there was a drought. The people would cut themselves hoping that their spilt blood would encourage Mot to release Baal. The prophets began slashing themselves hoping that Baal would answer them, but there was no voice, no answer, and no response (18.29).
When it was Elijah’s turn, he prepared the altar, prayed to God, and doused the altar with water. Fire from heaven came down and devoured the offering and even the water. The people came to the conclusion that YHWH is God, YHWH is God (18.39). No longer are there “two opinions.” Not only did God win that day, but the people won as God sent rain to bless the land.
Perhaps there are a couple of lessons that we can learn. God is mutually exclusive. You cannot be whole heartedly devoted to two things (Rev. 3.16). Next, God helped the people believe. From Abraham, to Jacob, to king Ahaz, God often went out of his way to help people believe in him. Finally, life comes from having God as our one opinion. The followers of Baal got death (18.40). In this narrative, one’s opinion really did matter!
Thursday, April 3, 2008
My God has Hands
One of the dark periods of pre-monarch Israel was the spiritual leadership of Hophni and Phinehas. After suffering a miserable defeat at the hands of the Philistines, the elders of Israel came to the conclusion that they had lost because they had not carried the ark into battle with them. They quickly disbursed to Shiloh and carried the ark to their next battle; with the accompaniment of Hophni and Phinehas (1 Samuel 4). The Hebrews foolishly believed that YHWH would have to fight for them if they carried the ark. God let them suffer a terrible defeat. Not only were many Israelites killed (Hophni and Phinehas), but the ark was taken captive. The news of the disaster led to the death of Eli and the premature labor of Phinehas’ wife. She gave birth to a son and in her dying words she named him “Ichabod” (without glory).
Perhaps the most intriguing part of this narrative lies in the events following the capture of the ark. In 1 Samuel 5, the Philistines take the ark to the Temple of Dagon and set it before the statue of Dagon (a position of submission). The Philistines believed their god had defeated Israel’s God. The next morning the statue of Dagon was found lying on its face. So they set Dagon back up. The next morning the temple priests were alarmed to find the torso of Dagon lying across the threshold. His hands and head had been “cut off.” With a touch of humor, the author of 1 Samuel tells us that the “hand of the Lord” was heavy upon the residents of Ashdod; opposed to Dagon who has no hands.
There are two lessons worth noting. First, rather than performing an internal check, Israel thought holy war ritual would encourage God to deliver them. Second, it is stunning that the Philistines continue to believe in a god that does not exist. Even when their god is proven to be powerless, they continue to put him on a pedestal and act as if nothing happened. Unbelievably, the Philistines seek to be controlled by a god that doesn’t exist, while Israel tries to control the God that does. The Philistines had the right attitude but the wrong god. The Israelites have the right God but the wrong attitude!
Perhaps the most intriguing part of this narrative lies in the events following the capture of the ark. In 1 Samuel 5, the Philistines take the ark to the Temple of Dagon and set it before the statue of Dagon (a position of submission). The Philistines believed their god had defeated Israel’s God. The next morning the statue of Dagon was found lying on its face. So they set Dagon back up. The next morning the temple priests were alarmed to find the torso of Dagon lying across the threshold. His hands and head had been “cut off.” With a touch of humor, the author of 1 Samuel tells us that the “hand of the Lord” was heavy upon the residents of Ashdod; opposed to Dagon who has no hands.
There are two lessons worth noting. First, rather than performing an internal check, Israel thought holy war ritual would encourage God to deliver them. Second, it is stunning that the Philistines continue to believe in a god that does not exist. Even when their god is proven to be powerless, they continue to put him on a pedestal and act as if nothing happened. Unbelievably, the Philistines seek to be controlled by a god that doesn’t exist, while Israel tries to control the God that does. The Philistines had the right attitude but the wrong god. The Israelites have the right God but the wrong attitude!
Saturday, March 29, 2008
Respect God's Leaders
After the death of Ahab, King Ahaziah suffered a terrible fall and wondered whether he would live or not (2 Kings 1.1ff). He sent messengers to consult Baal-zebub ("lord of flies") to find out if he would get better. Not much is known about Baal-zebub, but it seemed that he was Philistine god of oracles. Elijah met up with the messengers and gave them a question they were to deliver to the king: "Is it because there is no God in Israel that you seek Baal-zebub?" Not only was God the true king of Israel, but his chosen prophets also were leaders over the people. Israel's kings only had the power that God granted them. Prophets had a unique role because they were God's mouth pieces to the king. Failing to honor and respect the prophets was the same as failing to honor and respect God.
King Ahaziah then sent one of his captains and his 50 men to consult Elijah. The author of this narrative uses "come down" thematically to emphasize the respect that God's prophets should receive. As Elijah was sitting on a hilltop, the captain disrespectfully demands, man of God "come down!" The only thing to "come down" was a consuming fire (1.9-10). The king sent another captain and his 50 men (2 Kgs. 1.11-12). This captain also demanded that Elijah "come down." Again, fire "came down" and consumed the captain and his men. The king sends another captain and his 50 men to bring Elijah. This captain wisely evaluated the past and carefully considered his approach. He "went up" to Elijah and "came down" on his knees to ask Elijah to come. Note how this captain recognized Elijah's role for he referred to himself and the 50 men as "your" servants, not the king's servants (1.13). What "came down" this time? Elijah!
The lesson: respect for God's leaders produces positive results. Two captains did not respect Elijah and 102 people died because of it.
King Ahaziah then sent one of his captains and his 50 men to consult Elijah. The author of this narrative uses "come down" thematically to emphasize the respect that God's prophets should receive. As Elijah was sitting on a hilltop, the captain disrespectfully demands, man of God "come down!" The only thing to "come down" was a consuming fire (1.9-10). The king sent another captain and his 50 men (2 Kgs. 1.11-12). This captain also demanded that Elijah "come down." Again, fire "came down" and consumed the captain and his men. The king sends another captain and his 50 men to bring Elijah. This captain wisely evaluated the past and carefully considered his approach. He "went up" to Elijah and "came down" on his knees to ask Elijah to come. Note how this captain recognized Elijah's role for he referred to himself and the 50 men as "your" servants, not the king's servants (1.13). What "came down" this time? Elijah!
The lesson: respect for God's leaders produces positive results. Two captains did not respect Elijah and 102 people died because of it.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
The Power of Example
As a follow up to Psa. 137, I ask you to view things from a Babylonian perspective. If you were a Babylonian and were witnessing the captivity of Judah, what would you conclude about their God? More than likely, you would either think he did not exist or he was deficient in power. Why would you think this? Because Judah is in captivity. However, if you were a Judahite, you knew that YHWH existed even though your present condition does not bear a true witness. It is true that Judah is God's and he alone is God. What prevents the Babylonians from understanding this is Judah's captivity, which is the result of their sin.
My point with this illustration is this: The Babylonians would probably have had a hard time believing in YHWH because of Judah’s captivity. In effect, Judah’s sin not only led to their captivity but it also could have prevented the Babylonians from believing in God. This is one of the multiple problems with sin. It not only prevents our relationship with God but it can also be a barrier for someone else to develop a relationship with God (Perhaps this is what John meant in Rev. 1.12, 20; 2.5).
Think how the Babylonians would have seen things. They saw those who claimed to be God’s people but they did not see God. When the world looks at you do they see God? The more I think about this the more I understand “you are to be holy because I am holy” (Lev. 11.44; 1 Pet. 1.16). If I truly love God and my neighbor there is nothing more that I should desire than to please God and do everything to help my neighbor please God. When I first thought from the Babylonian perspective, I was terrified when I considered the consequences that can result from my actions. It is terrifying to think that my actions could not only affect my relationship with God, but they could affect someone else's relationship with God. Perhaps this is the lesson of the parable of the lost coin in Luke 15. The coin was lost because of the neglect of someone else!
Monday, March 17, 2008
Remember
Psa. 137 is an interesting text. Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians in 587/86 BC and many of its residents were taken captive. It was no surprise that this happened considering the countless warnings given by the prophets. This Psalm picks up with some of the exiles positioned beside one of the many waterfronts of Babylon. The exiles sat with their harps hung in the willows and their hearts low. Separation from the Temple in Jerusalem probably prohibited the exiles from worshipping God (4). It seems that the Babylonian captives knew this and were demanding that the exiles play a song for them (3), which in effect, was like saying, “where is your God now!” The Psalmist proclaims a promise, If I forget you, Jerusalem, may my right hand wither away! May my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I fail to remember you.
The OT gives at least three ways that one can forget God: 1. Abandon the Lord (Isa. 49.14), 2. Pervert his ways (Jer. 3.21), 3. Commit idolatry (Deut. 4.23). Why would one wager the use of their hand and tongue for failing to remember Jerusalem? A mute tongue and a withered hand were two of seven things that were associated with useless idols in Psa. 115.4-8. The Psalmist also declares that those who worship such inept idols will become like the idols themselves (115.8). If these two Psalms can be seen as enlightening one another, then the exiles may become like mute, immobile idols if they forget Jerusalem.
Ironically, Psalm 137 portrays Judah as a powerless nation in Babylon. One of the reasons God allowed Judah to be taken captive was their idolatrous practices. They had forgotten God and replaced him with idols. Fittingly, they now find themselves powerless, just like the idols they had served. I think it is fair to say that the Babylonian Exile cured the Jews of idol worship. But before they found the cure, they learned firsthand what an idol could do for them: Nothing! The Psalmist gives great advice for preventing such a predicament, Remember! Similarly, Peter declares that remembering the Lord’s sacrificial death can prevent Christians from becoming useless (2 Pet. 1.5-9). Those who are not growing but becoming useless, unproductive, and blind can attribute it to one thing: they have forgotten what the Lord has done for them (2 Pet. 1.9).
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places
Samson's birth was a phenomenon in and of itself. Before his birth, Samson's mother knew that her son would be special because a man of God told her that he would be called to live a life of separation, known as the Nazarite vow (Judges 13.7). This vow could be remitted at any time (Num. 6.13), but it seems that in Samuel and Samson's case it was a lifelong commitment. The Nazarite vow was a special vow of separation one could take for the Lord. It forbid a razor from cutting the hair and it called for abstinence from anything associated with the vine.
Knowing that he must live a life of separation from fruit of the vine, it is ironic that he seeks Delilah in 16.4. There are two things that should have been an indication to Samson that she was trouble. First of all, Samson found her in the valley of Sorek. At first this may seem innocent, but a quick definition of Sorek will reveal that it means "grapes." For a man committed to the Nazarite vow, a valley of grapes was the last place he needed to be. Second, her name means something to the effect "one that tastes good" or "dainty one." Samson fell in love with the "dainty one" who lived in the valley of grapes. This had temptation written all over it from the beginning.
As is still true today, be careful where you look to find your love!
Knowing that he must live a life of separation from fruit of the vine, it is ironic that he seeks Delilah in 16.4. There are two things that should have been an indication to Samson that she was trouble. First of all, Samson found her in the valley of Sorek. At first this may seem innocent, but a quick definition of Sorek will reveal that it means "grapes." For a man committed to the Nazarite vow, a valley of grapes was the last place he needed to be. Second, her name means something to the effect "one that tastes good" or "dainty one." Samson fell in love with the "dainty one" who lived in the valley of grapes. This had temptation written all over it from the beginning.
As is still true today, be careful where you look to find your love!
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Isaiah Had It RIght
The more I read the message of Isaiah, the more I see the similarities between his society and ours. Study the progression of modern philosophy. We live in an era often labeled Post-Modernism. Our society thinks that it is on the cutting edge of human reason and thought when in fact the PM mind is nothing new. The core element to PM is individualism. Everything is about Me. I make up right and wrong, no one can judge me, and there is no reality outside of what I think. Isaiah 2.1-4.1 warns of exalting ourselves to such a level. The outcome will always be humiliation. If you trace the development of modern philosophy back to the Enlightenment period through Kant, Darwin, Marx, Nietzsche and others you will notice that many philosophers were concluding that reality is intrinsic (humans are highest level of existence). Watch what happens when people conclude that God doesn’t exist and there is no purpose to life. If there is no purpose then life is meaningless. If humans are the highest order, then there is no purpose to life or any meaning. Thus, when humans exalt themselves and say that they are the pinnacle of existence the result is that it is meaningless. And so Isaiah was right, when we exalt ourselves we really humiliate ourselves by concluding that we are worthless.
Let’s look at another example of how individualism has crept into religion. The modern “evangelical” trend has become unbalanced. Have you ever noticed that “evangelicals” have grown in our society but morality has declined? It is because the 19th-20th century Christianity had a distorted view of righteousness. It is a compromise between following God and still doing what I want to do. The belief is that God has called us because we accepted Christ’s sacrificial death but personal conduct is irrelevant. If you add this understanding with a false sense of security the results are harmful. You will see the effect: I can live however I want because I have been saved and can never lose my salvation.
Both of these mindsets are based on individualism. How do we overcome individualism? Isaiah has 66 chapters that deal with that question. His answer is servanthood or as Jesus called it, the greatest commandments; Love God and Love your neighbor (Matt. 22.36-40). It comes through submission to God’s will and others well-being. Why is servanthood a Christian virtue? Because God IS servanthood (Isa. 53.10-12)!
Let’s look at another example of how individualism has crept into religion. The modern “evangelical” trend has become unbalanced. Have you ever noticed that “evangelicals” have grown in our society but morality has declined? It is because the 19th-20th century Christianity had a distorted view of righteousness. It is a compromise between following God and still doing what I want to do. The belief is that God has called us because we accepted Christ’s sacrificial death but personal conduct is irrelevant. If you add this understanding with a false sense of security the results are harmful. You will see the effect: I can live however I want because I have been saved and can never lose my salvation.
Both of these mindsets are based on individualism. How do we overcome individualism? Isaiah has 66 chapters that deal with that question. His answer is servanthood or as Jesus called it, the greatest commandments; Love God and Love your neighbor (Matt. 22.36-40). It comes through submission to God’s will and others well-being. Why is servanthood a Christian virtue? Because God IS servanthood (Isa. 53.10-12)!
Monday, March 3, 2008
Having the Intelligence of a Donkey
The prophet Isaiah began his ministry during the last year of King Uzziah’s reign. This was a time marked by steady decline in Judah's faithfulness, morality, and knowledge. Isaiah claims that the people were less intelligent than an ox or donkey (1.3). At least these beasts know where the barn is and do not bite the hand that feeds them. The spiritual condition of Israel was like a wounded man and an unmaintained hut. Wounds that are left unattended will result in death and a shelter that is not maintained will eventually fall. Likewise, if Judah continues to reject God, they will be punished.
There are two ways Israel can deal with their alienation from God. First, they can follow the wrong way (9-15). Many at that time thought they were immune from judgment because they were children of God (and would always be) and were following the strict ritual that God had revealed. This is what I like to call “checklist discipleship.” If we follow the ritual without a relationship, we are not true disciples. This attitude can be seen today when people believe they only have to be baptized, go to church, and take the Lord’s Supper to go to heaven. Israel had followed the ritual but their hands were still full of blood. God desires a relationship, yet some follow God as a form of fire insurance (I won’t go to eternal punishment if I will just do this…). This reduces discipleship to an easy religion, something God has never promised.
Second, Israel can follow the right way (16-17). The covenant that reveals ritual also teaches the ethical treatment of others. The key to being a true disciple of God comes from a relationship with him and fellow man. Many today are divided on how to follow God. Does it come from knowing the doctrine of the Bible or showing love and kindness to others? The answer is both! God wants cleansing, reformation, justice, mercy, and care toward others (1.16-17).
The Lord invites Isaiah’s listeners to “come and let us reason together.” If one lifestyle leads to destruction (1.20) and the other restoration (19), which one is best? Isaiah says that even an ox or a donkey can figure this out.
There are two ways Israel can deal with their alienation from God. First, they can follow the wrong way (9-15). Many at that time thought they were immune from judgment because they were children of God (and would always be) and were following the strict ritual that God had revealed. This is what I like to call “checklist discipleship.” If we follow the ritual without a relationship, we are not true disciples. This attitude can be seen today when people believe they only have to be baptized, go to church, and take the Lord’s Supper to go to heaven. Israel had followed the ritual but their hands were still full of blood. God desires a relationship, yet some follow God as a form of fire insurance (I won’t go to eternal punishment if I will just do this…). This reduces discipleship to an easy religion, something God has never promised.
Second, Israel can follow the right way (16-17). The covenant that reveals ritual also teaches the ethical treatment of others. The key to being a true disciple of God comes from a relationship with him and fellow man. Many today are divided on how to follow God. Does it come from knowing the doctrine of the Bible or showing love and kindness to others? The answer is both! God wants cleansing, reformation, justice, mercy, and care toward others (1.16-17).
The Lord invites Isaiah’s listeners to “come and let us reason together.” If one lifestyle leads to destruction (1.20) and the other restoration (19), which one is best? Isaiah says that even an ox or a donkey can figure this out.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
What direction are you headed?
What direction are you headed? A quick survey of the Old Testament will teach us that traveling east is not wise. When Adam and Eve were expelled from the garden, it seems they went east because of the positioning of the Cherubim (Gen. 3.24). After murdering his brother, Cain went away from the presence of the Lord and settled in the East (Gen. 4.16). After the flood, the sons of Noah were told to spread out and repopulate the earth. Instead, they journeyed east and built a tower (Gen. 11.2). During the time of Gideon, enemy sons of the East encamped in the land with hopes of fighting Israel (Jud. 6.33). Isaiah tells how God has abandoned his people because they have fallen prey to eastern influences (Isa. 2.6). Even an east wind brings famine, drought, and locusts (Gen. 41.6, 23; Ex. 10.13). It seems from these passages that the east came to represent separation from God, evil influence, and despair. What direction are you headed in your spiritual journey? Might I suggest that you try to avoid traveling east!
Thursday, February 21, 2008
Learning to Trust God: the finale
We can learn a lot from studying Abram’s association with Lot. Abram became the source of blessing to the world. People who associated with Abram would in turn be blessed. Abram had become wealthy. He had received livestock and possessions from Pharaoh, probably as a dowry for Sarai (Gen. 12.16). Lot was traveling with Abram and had also acquired many possessions.
A problem surfaced when the land could not support the livestock of both Lot and Abram (13.6-7). If Abram is the seat of blessings and Lot has been blessed in his association with Abram, what would be the wisest choice for Lot? Yet Lot lifted his eyes and saw the Jordan valley. The verb translated “saw” is the also used in Genesis 3.6 when Eve was saw tempted. Lot is being tempted at the sight of the Jordan plain. There is a random reference to the garden in 13.10, probably another indication that Lot is being tempted. Lot separated himself from Abram and dwelled near Sodom.
Biblical Hebrew has its own narrative verbal system. Sometimes what is known as a disjunctive waw interrupts the narrative giving necessary information for the understanding of the text. Such is the case in Gen. 13.13 when the narrative pauses to describe the sinful condition of the city of Sodom. As the plot thickens, the author's placement of disjunctive waw's give us plenty to reflect upon. In Genesis 14.12, we learn that Lot has moved into the city of Sodom. Another disjunctive waw appears in 14.13 to tell us that Abram is living under an oak tree in Mamre.
What can we learn from comparing Abram and Lot? First of all, Appearances really are deceiving. Abram is the seat of blessings (as Christ is now). If Lot were wise, he would have realized that his future would be blessed by staying with Abram. The plain of Jordan was beautiful to the eye but wicked to the soul. Second, staying with Abram would have necessitated Lot leaving behind all of his possessions. Rather than relinquishing his possessions he distances himself from Abram and inches closer to wickedness. Lot needed Abram's example of how to trust God. Finally, Lot sought security behind the walls of Sodom while Abram is living in the open under an oak tree. Lot sought security and prosperity behind city walls, but Abram lived under a tree. Peace and prosperity come not from city walls, but a right relationship with God!
Monday, February 18, 2008
Learning to Trust God: part 2
There is second aspect of Abram’s call that has intrigued me. God commands Abram to Leave his country, kinsmen, and family, Go to an unfamiliar land, and Be a blessing. First, it is worth noting that Abram is originally from Ur and has moved to Haran. Both of these cities worshipped the moon god Sin. Some even think Abram’s name (Abram = “exalted father”) was a nickname of the moon god Sin. This is probably why his name is later changed to Abraham (“father of nations”). For Abram to be a blessing, he must leave the influences of his country, family, and friends. Abram can’t be a blessing if he is like everyone else. God is calling him to leave the past and embark on a new lifestyle of faith.
Second, Abram’s faith is proven when he departs his country. This is Abram’s first recorded encounter with YHWH. We have no information that Abram knows the Lord or has ever had any knowledge of him. Yet, the Lord calls Abram and tells him to go to an unknown land. Abram packs up and goes. We can conclude from the text that Abram has an immediate trust in the Lord. God’s promises to Abram are persuasive but they do require changes. Obviously, if Abram does not leave his country he will not receive the blessings God has promised. God’s promises are conditional. Abram believes the promises to be worth the cost and his faith is seen in his action. He goes to Canaan.
Next, Abram continues to trust the Lord’s plan even though it may have initially looked like a bad idea. The Canaanites possess the land and could be seen as a potential threat. The land is also stricken with a severe famine. Imagine that the Lord calls you and tells you to leave everything you have been accustomed to and go to some unknown land. Shortly after you go to the land, you find that it is already possessed and afflicted with famine.
God promised Abram great blessings if he would leave his past behind and take on the task of being a blessing. Like Abram, we cannot help the world if we are just like the world. Abram’s call is much like Christ’s call. He has called his followers to practice a lifestyle of holiness, reformation of character, and service. Some new Christians quickly find their new walk of life to be difficult (as Abram found Canaan). We must follow in the footsteps of Abram and continue to trust God.
Second, Abram’s faith is proven when he departs his country. This is Abram’s first recorded encounter with YHWH. We have no information that Abram knows the Lord or has ever had any knowledge of him. Yet, the Lord calls Abram and tells him to go to an unknown land. Abram packs up and goes. We can conclude from the text that Abram has an immediate trust in the Lord. God’s promises to Abram are persuasive but they do require changes. Obviously, if Abram does not leave his country he will not receive the blessings God has promised. God’s promises are conditional. Abram believes the promises to be worth the cost and his faith is seen in his action. He goes to Canaan.
Next, Abram continues to trust the Lord’s plan even though it may have initially looked like a bad idea. The Canaanites possess the land and could be seen as a potential threat. The land is also stricken with a severe famine. Imagine that the Lord calls you and tells you to leave everything you have been accustomed to and go to some unknown land. Shortly after you go to the land, you find that it is already possessed and afflicted with famine.
God promised Abram great blessings if he would leave his past behind and take on the task of being a blessing. Like Abram, we cannot help the world if we are just like the world. Abram’s call is much like Christ’s call. He has called his followers to practice a lifestyle of holiness, reformation of character, and service. Some new Christians quickly find their new walk of life to be difficult (as Abram found Canaan). We must follow in the footsteps of Abram and continue to trust God.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
